These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8672875)
1. Risk assessment of carcinogens in Japan. Hayashi Y Exp Toxicol Pathol; 1996 Feb; 48(2-3):197. PubMed ID: 8672875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans]. IARC Vopr Onkol; 2007; 53(6):621-41. PubMed ID: 18416130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer risk assessment of direct acting carcinogens. Zito R J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 10606168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating cell proliferation in quantitative cancer risk assessment: approaches, issues, and uncertainties. Chen C; Farland W Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 369():481-99. PubMed ID: 1946541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in animal and human responses to carcinogenic metals. Gibb HJ; Farland WH Prog Clin Biol Res; 1992; 374():367-79. PubMed ID: 1620712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinogenic risk assessment--the consequences of believing models. Crouch EA Basic Life Sci; 1983; 24():653-65. PubMed ID: 6860280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of human cancer potency projections for dieldrin based on human data with those based on animal data. Sielken RL; Stevenson DE Prog Clin Biol Res; 1992; 374():295-319. PubMed ID: 1620708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A risk assessment perspective: application of mode of action and human relevance frameworks to the analysis of rodent tumor data. Dellarco VL; Baetcke K Toxicol Sci; 2005 Jul; 86(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15939704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Risk evaluation of carcinogens and their threshold levels, part III]. Neumann HG Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Sep; 49(9):911-20. PubMed ID: 16937321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating the concept of 'invaders' and 'defenders' in the dose-response modeling of carcinogens. Stevenson DE; Sielken RL Prog Clin Biol Res; 1995; 391():445-51. PubMed ID: 8532736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Opportunity of conservative risk assessment in carcinogenesis. Zapponi GA; Bucchi AR; Lupi C; Rossi L Med Lav; 1986; 77(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 3784943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives on the risk assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens and tumor promoters. Perera FP Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Aug; 94():231-5. PubMed ID: 1954932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A decision tree approach for carcinogen risk assessment. Butterworth BE; Eldridge SR Prog Clin Biol Res; 1995; 391():49-70. PubMed ID: 8532737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Role of DNA repair in chemical carcinogenesis]. Likhachev AIa Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 3544490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New in vitro approaches to explore cellular and molecular events related to carcinogenesis. Fimognari C; NĂ¼sse M; Forti GC; Hrelia P Pharmacol Res; 2000 Apr; 41(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 10704260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]