These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8672901)
1. New reproductive technologies: the Canadian perspective. Baird PA Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):156-66. PubMed ID: 8672901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brief of the Law Reform Commission of Canada to the Royal Commission on new reproductive technologies. Jones DJ Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10121310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Medical Research Council's new guidelines on research involving human subjects: too much law, too little ethics. Hoffmaster B Health Law Can; 1989; 10(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 10313310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The new biotech world order. Cahill LS Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 10321345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The report on new reproductive technologies: will it lead to change, or gather dust? Gray C CMAJ; 1994 Jan; 150(2):266-8. PubMed ID: 11652722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics, choice, and policy. Churchill L Bull N Y Acad Med; 1992; 68(2):265-70; discussion 271-5. PubMed ID: 1586861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technologies, ads, and ethics: philosophical, ethical, and clinical perspectives on the use of advertising in reproductive medicine. A conference held by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction. Macklin R; White GB Womens Health Issues; 1997; 7(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 9203857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulating assisted reproductive technologies: an ethical framework. Steinbock B Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 8672902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Foetal tissue transplantation research: a Canadian policy analysis. Martin DK Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 10121312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Betwixt and between human stem cell guidelines and legislation. Baylis F Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15739317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report. Shanner L Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects. J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical and legal concerns: reproductive technologies 1990-1993. Knoppers BM; Le Bris S Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 5(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 8241439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The work of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction. White GB Nursingconnections; 1994; 7(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 7997291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent: between ethics and law. Pilotto F; Badon P Dolentium Hominum; 2002; 17(3):29-34. PubMed ID: 16459395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preimplantation embryos, research ethics, and public policy. Tauer CA Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(3):30-7. PubMed ID: 11653183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cultural models and the future of bioethics. Rodotà S J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():33-45. PubMed ID: 10134813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. White House bill would ban human cloning. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6634):644. PubMed ID: 9192876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]