These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8673302)
1. Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects. Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carrera-San Martín A; Jurado F J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jul; 183(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8673302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of relaparotomy through previously integrated polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene experimental implants in the abdominal wall. Bellón JM; Contreras LA; Buján J; Pascual G; Carrera-San Martín A J Am Coll Surg; 1999 May; 188(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 10235573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The behavior of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring process of abdominal wall defects. Buján J; Contreras LA; Carrera-San Martín A; Bellón JM Histol Histopathol; 1997 Jul; 12(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 9225151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of the tissue integration of a new modified polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis: Mycro Mesh. Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carreras-San Martín A; Hernando A; Jurado F Biomaterials; 1996 Jul; 17(13):1265-71. PubMed ID: 8805973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neoperitoneal formation after implantation of various biomaterials for the repair of abdominal wall defects in rabbits. Bellón JM; Contreras LA; Pascual G; Bujan J Eur J Surg; 1999 Feb; 165(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 10192572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental assay of a Dual Mesh polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis (non-porous on one side) in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Bellón JM; Contreras LA; Buján J; Carrea-San Martin A Biomaterials; 1996 Dec; 17(24):2367-72. PubMed ID: 8982477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporary closure of the abdomen using a new composite prosthesis (PL-PU99). Bellón JM; García-Honduvilla N; Carnicer E; Serrano N; Rodríguez M; Buján J Am J Surg; 2004 Sep; 188(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 15450840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of biomaterials in the repair of abdominal wall defects: a comparative study between polypropylene meshes (Marlex) and a new polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis (Dual Mesh). Bellón JM; Contreras LA; Buján J; Carrera-San Martín A J Biomater Appl; 1997 Oct; 12(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 9399138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit. Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of nonporous polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis in combination with polypropylene prosthetic abdominal wall implants in prevention of peritoneal adhesions. Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Jurado F J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 9283964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects. Law NW Acta Chir Scand; 1990; 156(11-12):759-62. PubMed ID: 1963726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. Konstantinovic ML; Lagae P; Zheng F; Verbeken EK; De Ridder D; Deprest JA BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1554-60. PubMed ID: 16225578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Marlex and Gore-tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Murphy JL; Freeman JB; Dionne PG Can J Surg; 1989 Jul; 32(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 2736451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Jenkins SD; Klamer TW; Parteka JJ; Condon RE Surgery; 1983 Aug; 94(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 6224307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines. Amid PK; Shulman AG; Lichtenstein IL; Sostrin S; Young J; Hakakha M J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Mar; 28(3):373-5. PubMed ID: 8077252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall. Bleichrodt RP; Simmermacher RK; van der Lei B; Schakenraad JM Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jan; 176(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 8427001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peritoneal regeneration after implant of a composite prosthesis in the abdominal wall. Bellón JM; García-Carranza A; Jurado F; García-Honduvilla N; Carrera-San Martin A; Buján J World J Surg; 2001 Feb; 25(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 11338014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Menon NG; Rodriguez ED; Byrnes CK; Girotto JA; Goldberg NH; Silverman RP Ann Plast Surg; 2003 May; 50(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 12792544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]