523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8673717)
1. Liver. III: Gadolinium-based hepatobiliary contrast agents (Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg).
Giovagnoni A; Paci E
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1996 Feb; 4(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 8673717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A comparative study between Gd-BOPTA, a biliary excretion contrast medium, and Gd-DTPA in the magnetic resonance imaging of the rat liver].
Patrizio G; Pavone P; Cardone G; Pietroletti R; Passariello R; Tettamanti E; Musu C; Felder E
Radiol Med; 1990 May; 79(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 2359853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers.
Brismar TB; Dahlstrom N; Edsborg N; Persson A; Smedby O; Albiin N
Acta Radiol; 2009 Sep; 50(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 19701821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver].
Zhang HM; Ouyang H; Zhou CW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 16750014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA, a new liver-specific magnetic resonance contrast agent. Kinetic and enhancement patterns in normal and cholestatic rats.
Clément O; Mühler A; Vexler V; Berthezène Y; Brasch RC
Invest Radiol; 1992 Aug; 27(8):612-9. PubMed ID: 1428739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree.
Seale MK; Catalano OA; Saini S; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
Radiographics; 2009 Oct; 29(6):1725-48. PubMed ID: 19959518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence.
Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Shamsi K; Balzer T; Daldrup HE; Tombach B; Hesse T; Berns T; Peters PE
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 8633143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of gadoxetate disodium as a contrast agent for mouse liver imaging: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Kiryu S; Inoue Y; Watanabe M; Izawa K; Shimada M; Tojo A; Yoshikawa K; Ohtomo K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18599243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium.
Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Gd-Bz-TTDA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Gd-BOPTA for dynamic MR imaging of the liver in rat models.
Jaw TS; Chen SH; Wang YM; Hsu JS; Kuo YT; Chiu YY; Tsai KB; Hsieh TJ; Liu GC
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Mar; 28(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 22385605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hepatocellular MR contrast agents: enhancement characteristics of liver parenchyma and portal vein after administration of gadoxetic acid in comparison to gadobenate dimeglumine.
Feuerlein S; Gupta RT; Boll DT; Merkle EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2037-41. PubMed ID: 21719224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The dynamic magnetic resonance study of focal liver lesions by FLASH sequences with bolus intravenous gadolinium-DTPA].
Olivetti L; Grazioli L; Maroldi R; Matricardi L; Milanesio L
Radiol Med; 1992 Apr; 83(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1318558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hepatobiliary enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA: comparison of spin-echo and STIR imaging for detection of experimental liver metastases.
Mühler A; Clément O; Vexler V; Berthezène Y; Rosenau W; Brasch RC
Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):207-13. PubMed ID: 1609081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Focal liver lesions: whether a standard dose (0.05 mmol/kg) gadobenate dimeglumine can provide the same diagnostic data as the 0.1 mmol/kg dose.
Nural MS; Gokce E; Danaci M; Bayrak IK; Diren HB
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17555901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liver MRI with contrast enhancement.
Runge VM
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Jun; 38(3):207-30. PubMed ID: 9226107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Gd-BOPTA with Gd-DTPA in MR imaging of rat liver.
Pavone P; Patrizio G; Buoni C; Tettamanti E; Passariello R; Musu C; Tirone P; Felder E
Radiology; 1990 Jul; 176(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 2353112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.
Nassenstein K; Breuckmann F; Hunold P; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 19308763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
