337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8674921)
1. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.
Pugliese V; Conio M; Nicolò G; Saccomanno S; Gatteschi B
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec; 42(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 8674921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of novel slim biopsy forceps for diagnosis of biliary strictures: Single-institutional study of consecutive 360 cases (with video).
Yamamoto K; Tsuchiya T; Itoi T; Tsuji S; Tanaka R; Tonozuka R; Honjo M; Mukai S; Kamada K; Fujita M; Asai Y; Matsunami Y; Nagakawa Y; Yamaguchi H; Sofuni A
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Sep; 23(35):6429-6436. PubMed ID: 29085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical significance of bile cytology via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube for pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
Yagioka H; Hirano K; Isayama H; Tsujino T; Sasahira N; Nagano R; Hamada T; Miyabayashi K; Ito Y; Mohri D; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Tada M; Koike K
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2011 Mar; 18(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 20931342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study.
Ponchon T; Gagnon P; Berger F; Labadie M; Liaras A; Chavaillon A; Bory R
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec; 42(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 8674929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of new biliary biopsy cannulae for malignant bile duct strictures via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pathway.
Zhuang MQ; Zheng C; Xie WW; Xu L; Wu JL; Zhang DQ; Chen YG; Niu SS; Zhan X; Zhou YB
Asian J Surg; 2024 Jan; 47(1):471-476. PubMed ID: 37142503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Weber A; von Weyhern C; Fend F; Schneider J; Neu B; Meining A; Weidenbach H; Schmid RM; Prinz C
World J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 14(7):1097-101. PubMed ID: 18286693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoductal tissue sampling of biliary strictures through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan creatography (ERCP).
Pugliese V; Antonelli G; Vincenti M; Gatteschi B
Tumori; 1997; 83(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 9267491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.
Schoefl R; Haefner M; Wrba F; Pfeffel F; Stain C; Poetzi R; Gangl A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 9140159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.
Mohammad Alizadeh AH; Mousavi M; Salehi B; Molaei M; Khodadoostan M; Afzali ES; Dadvar Z; Mirsattari D; Aghdaei HA; Lahmi F; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 22320994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice.
Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.
Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EUS-FNA for suspected malignant biliary strictures after negative endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Ohshima Y; Yasuda I; Kawakami H; Kuwatani M; Mukai T; Iwashita T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Hirose Y; Asaka M; Moriwaki H
J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 21526370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
