These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8674998)

  • 1. Effect of group status on physical attractiveness preferences--from the Japanese case to a general cognitive perspective.
    Kowner R
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1996 May; 122(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 8674998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR.
    Frederick DA; Hadji-Michael M; Furnham A; Swami V
    Body Image; 2010 Jan; 7(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 19822462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond initial attraction: physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage.
    McNulty JK; Neff LA; Karney BR
    J Fam Psychol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 18266540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.
    Rhodes G
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2006; 57():199-226. PubMed ID: 16318594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
    Johnston VS
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cultural grounding of personal relationship: the importance of attractiveness in everyday life.
    Anderson SL; Adams G; Plaut VC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):352-68. PubMed ID: 18665707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weight preoccupation as a function of observed physical attractiveness: ethnic differences among normal-weight adolescent females.
    Colabianchi N; Ievers-Landis CE; Borawski EA
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2006 Sep; 31(8):803-12. PubMed ID: 16371571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness?
    Swami V; Tovée MJ
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):353-63. PubMed ID: 16848948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: tracking down the "beauty is beastly" effect.
    Johnson SK; Podratz KE; Dipboye RL; Gibbons E
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 20575336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.
    Montoya RM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1315-31. PubMed ID: 18599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: the role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behavior.
    Leenaars LS; Dane AV; Marini ZA
    Aggress Behav; 2008; 34(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 18351598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
    Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of physical attractiveness in romantic partners: modeling biological and social variables.
    Jonason PK
    J Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 149(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 19425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-cultural comparisons of health-related quality of life in Australian and Japanese midlife women: the Australian and Japanese Midlife Women's Health Study.
    Anderson DJ; Yoshizawa T
    Menopause; 2007; 14(4):697-707. PubMed ID: 17438514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.