205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8675777)
1. Effect of variance of interaction effects of sire and herd on selection for milk and fat yield.
Dimov G; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Norman HD
J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jan; 79(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 8675777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variance of interaction effects of sire and herd for yield traits of Holsteins in California, New York, and Pennsylvania with an animal model.
Dimov G; Albuquerque LG; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Norman HD
J Dairy Sci; 1995 Apr; 78(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 7790587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
Dechow CD; Norman HD
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variances of direct genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, and cytoplasmic inheritance effects for milk yield, fat yield, and fat percentage.
Albuquerque LG; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 1998 Feb; 81(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 9532509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic analysis of herd life in Canadian dairy cattle on a lactation basis using a Weibull proportional hazards model.
Sewalem A; Kistemaker GJ; Ducrocq V; Van Doormaal BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 15591401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variance caused by cytoplasmic line and sire by herd interaction effects for milk yield considering estimation bias.
Rorato PR; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 1999 Jul; 82(7):1574-80. PubMed ID: 10416173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity.
Fahey AG; Schutz MM; Lofgren DL; Schinckel AP; Stewart TS
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3889-99. PubMed ID: 17639000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein cattle in seventeen countries.
Zwald NR; Weigel KA; Fikse WF; Rekaya R
J Dairy Sci; 2003 Mar; 86(3):1009-18. PubMed ID: 12703638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heritability of changes in genetic evaluations of dairy bulls from first to later records of daughters.
Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 12018441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Covariance functions across herd production levels for test day records on milk, fat, and protein yields.
Veerkamp RF; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jun; 81(6):1690-701. PubMed ID: 9684176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using a multiple-trait model with individual animal performance records.
Weigel KA; Rekaya R; Zwald NR; Fikse WF
J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2789-95. PubMed ID: 11814036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic change in milk, fat, days open, and body weight after calving based on three methods of sire selection.
Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
J Dairy Sci; 2000 Jun; 83(6):1359-63. PubMed ID: 10877402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of milk production traits in early lactation using a reaction norm model with unknown covariates.
Shariati MM; Su G; Madsen P; Sorensen D
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5759-66. PubMed ID: 18024770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States.
Costa CN; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Oltenacu PA; Quaas RL; Searle SR
J Dairy Sci; 2000 Dec; 83(12):2963-74. PubMed ID: 11132868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions.
Raffrenato E; Blake RW; Oltenacu PA; Carvalheira J; Licitra G
J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jul; 86(7):2470-9. PubMed ID: 12906065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
