These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8675797)
1. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? Versluis A; Douglas WH; Cross M; Sakaguchi RL J Dent Res; 1996 Mar; 75(3):871-8. PubMed ID: 8675797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage. Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques. Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Bicalho AA; Ribeiro MTH; Price RB; Soares CJ J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study. Kowalczyk P Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in a premolar restored with different composite resins and different incremental techniques. Soares CJ; Bicalho AA; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A J Adhes Dent; 2013 Aug; 15(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 23560252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Barink M; Verdonschot N J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 14630896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods. Kim ME; Park SH Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress-reduced Direct Composites for the Restoration of Structurally Compromised Teeth: Fiber Design According to the "Wallpapering" Technique. Deliperi S; Alleman D; Rudo D Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):233-243. PubMed ID: 28467261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values. Fleming GJ; Hall DP; Shortall AC; Burke FJ J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15683895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]