These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8675843)

  • 21. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency.
    Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals.
    McFadden D; Pasanen EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2403-13. PubMed ID: 10212421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans with normal hearing].
    Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Sułkowski WJ; Murowaniecki Z
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1995; 49(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 7644200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors.
    Cane MA; Lutman ME; O'Donoghue GM
    Am J Otol; 1994 Mar; 15(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 8172303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reduced àudiogram ripple' in normally-hearing subjects with weak otoacoustic emissions.
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Audiology; 1999; 38(5):257-61. PubMed ID: 10548372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of ageing on otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression in humans.
    Quaranta N; Debole S; Di Girolamo S
    Audiology; 2001; 40(6):308-12. PubMed ID: 11781043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The influence of aging on otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Orecka B; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Czecior E
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2007; 61(5):796-800. PubMed ID: 18552022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of middle-ear effusion on otoacoustic emissions.
    Yeo SW; Park SN; Park YS; Suh BD
    J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Oct; 116(10):794-9. PubMed ID: 12437833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions.
    McFadden D; Mishra R
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8113138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aspects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns.
    Kok MR; van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8226331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds.
    Helleman HW; Jansen EJ; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):410-9. PubMed ID: 20192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl.
    Taschenberger G; Manley GA
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):61-76. PubMed ID: 9282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Bergman BM; Beauchaine KL; Kaminski JR; Peters J; Schulte L; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2639-48. PubMed ID: 8270740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Bergevin C; Fulcher A; Richmond S; Velenovsky D; Lee J
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):20-8. PubMed ID: 22509533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interrelations between psychoacoustical tuning curves and spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Micheyl C; Collet L
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 7997834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.