164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8676173)
1. Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data.
Ghali WA; Hall RE; Rosen AK; Ash AS; Moskowitz MA
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Mar; 49(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 8676173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
Quan H; Sundararajan V; Halfon P; Fong A; Burnand B; Luthi JC; Saunders LD; Beck CA; Feasby TE; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16224307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk adjustment for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an administrative approach versus EuroSCORE.
Ugolini C; Nobilio L
Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Apr; 16(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15051710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a self-report-generated Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting mortality.
Chaudhry S; Jin L; Meltzer D
Med Care; 2005 Jun; 43(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 15908856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.
Southern DA; Quan H; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 15076812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research.
Needham DM; Scales DC; Laupacis A; Pronovost PJ
J Crit Care; 2005 Mar; 20(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 16015512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.
Sundararajan V; Henderson T; Perry C; Muggivan A; Quan H; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1288-94. PubMed ID: 15617955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.
Quan H; Parsons GA; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2002 Aug; 40(8):675-85. PubMed ID: 12187181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the performance of the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity measures across five European countries and three conditions.
Gutacker N; Bloor K; Cookson R
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 25 Suppl 1():15-20. PubMed ID: 25690125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.
Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():62-69. PubMed ID: 27101889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality.
Ward MM
J Rheumatol; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1408-13. PubMed ID: 10852262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.
Simard M; Sirois C; Candas B
Med Care; 2018 May; 56(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 29578951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted mortality but not resource utilization following hip fracture.
Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 25447352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing an adapted Charlson comorbidity index for ischemic stroke outcome studies.
Hall RE; Porter J; Quan H; Reeves MJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Dec; 19(1):930. PubMed ID: 31796024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A disease-specific comorbidity index for predicting mortality in patients admitted to hospital with a cardiac condition.
Azzalini L; Chabot-Blanchet M; Southern DA; Nozza A; Wilton SB; Graham MM; Gravel GM; Bluteau JP; Rouleau JL; Guertin MC; Jolicoeur EM
CMAJ; 2019 Mar; 191(11):E299-E307. PubMed ID: 30885968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.
Bottle A; Aylin P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1426-33. PubMed ID: 21764557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new casemix adjustment index for hospital mortality among patients with congestive heart failure.
Polanczyk CA; Rohde LE; Philbin EA; Di Salvo TG
Med Care; 1998 Oct; 36(10):1489-99. PubMed ID: 9794342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
