86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8676262)
1. Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry.
Mourtada FA; Beck TJ; Hauser DL; Ruff CB; Bao G
J Orthop Res; 1996 May; 14(3):483-92. PubMed ID: 8676262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental testing of a DEXA-derived curved beam model of the proximal femur.
Beck TJ; Mourtada FA; Ruff CB; Scott WW; Kao G
J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 9671936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age trends in femur stresses from a simulated fall on the hip among men and women: evidence of homeostatic adaptation underlying the decline in hip BMD.
Beck TJ; Looker AC; Mourtada F; Daphtary MM; Ruff CB
J Bone Miner Res; 2006 Sep; 21(9):1425-32. PubMed ID: 16939401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femur geometry and body composition influence femoral neck stresses: A combined fall simulation and beam modelling approach.
Pretty SP; Mourtzakis M; Laing AC
J Biomech; 2022 Aug; 141():111192. PubMed ID: 35764013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microstructural failure mechanisms in the human proximal femur for sideways fall loading.
Nawathe S; Akhlaghpour H; Bouxsein ML; Keaveny TM
J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Feb; 29(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 23832419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disproportionate, age-related bone loss in long bone ends: a structural analysis based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Sievänen H; Uusi-Rasi K; Heinonen A; Oja P; Vuori I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 10692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur.
Langton CM; Pisharody S; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 19230742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Curved Beam Computed Tomography based Structural Rigidity Analysis of Bones with Simulated Lytic Defect: A Comparative Study with Finite Element Analysis.
Oftadeh R; Karimi Z; Villa-Camacho J; Tanck E; Verdonschot N; Goebel R; Snyder BD; Hashemi HN; Vaziri A; Nazarian A
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32397. PubMed ID: 27585495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel approach of predicting fracture load in the human proximal femur using non-invasive QCT imaging technique.
Lee T; Pereira BP; Chung YS; Oh HJ; Choi JB; Lim D; Shin JH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 37(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 19288197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.
Gnudi S; Ripamonti C; Gualtieri G; Malavolta N
Br J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 72(860):729-33. PubMed ID: 10624337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral bone density measurements by single energy computed tomography related to hip fractures.
Alho A; Høiseth A; Husby T; Ekeland A
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(5-6):208-11. PubMed ID: 3254683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptation of Proximal Femur to Mechanical Loading in Young Adults: Standard Vs Localized Regions Evaluated by DXA.
Baptista F; Lopes E; Matute-Llorente Á; Teles J; Zymbal V
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 30274880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical simulation of load-induced bone structural remodelling using stress-limit criterion.
Marzban A; Nayeb-Hashemi H; Vaziri A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 23697838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.
Fuchs RK; Carballido-Gamio J; Keyak JH; Kersh ME; Warden SJ
Bone; 2021 Nov; 152():116090. PubMed ID: 34175500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of impact direction on the structural capacity of the proximal femur during falls.
Ford CM; Keaveny TM; Hayes WC
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Mar; 11(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 8852948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis.
Testi D; Viceconti M; Baruffaldi F; Cappello A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1999 Jul; 60(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 10430460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
