These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8676264)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of calf and human spines.
    Wilke HJ; Krischak S; Claes L
    J Orthop Res; 1996 May; 14(3):500-3. PubMed ID: 8676264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
    Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments.
    Busscher I; van der Veen AJ; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):E35-42. PubMed ID: 20081499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formalin fixation strongly influences biomechanical properties of the spine.
    Wilke HJ; Krischak S; Claes LE
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1629-31. PubMed ID: 8945663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Biomechanical evaluation of stiffness of long-segment instrumented spine].
    Zhang J; Lu WW; Ye QB; Qiu GX
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Apr; 27(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 15960256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.
    Wilke HJ; Krischak ST; Wenger KH; Claes LE
    Eur Spine J; 1997; 6(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 9209882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?
    Kettler A; Liakos L; Haegele B; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2186-92. PubMed ID: 17721711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
    Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
    Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
    Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of creep and recovery on the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human multi-level thoracolumbar spinal segments.
    Busscher I; van Dieën JH; van der Veen AJ; Kingma I; Meijer GJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 21251737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immature sheep spines are more flexible than mature spines: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Clarke EC; Appleyard RC; Bilston LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2970-9. PubMed ID: 18091489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Static and dynamic analysis of five anterior instrumentation systems for thoracolumbar scoliosis.
    Shimamoto N; Kotani Y; Shono Y; Kadoya K; Abumi K; Minami A; Kaneda K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1678-85. PubMed ID: 12897491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
    Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
    Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.