These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8676272)

  • 1. Spatial resolution and angular alignment tolerance in radiometric analysis of alveolar bone change.
    Shrout MK; Weaver J; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Periodontol; 1996 Jan; 67(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8676272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial resolution in radiometric analysis of enamel loss. A pilot study.
    Shrout MK; Russell CM; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 8665323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jul; 84(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 9247959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements.
    Hildebolt CF; Bartlett TQ; Brunsden BS; Hente NL; Gravier MJ; Walkup RK; Shrout MK; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7835512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.
    Mol A; Dunn SM
    J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 12753368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of X-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic assessment of alveolar crest level.
    Zulqarnain BJ; Almas K
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(4):132-8. PubMed ID: 10530200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic absorptiometry method in measurement of localized alveolar bone density changes.
    Kuhl ED; Nummikoski PV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 10710466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of x-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Christersson L; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1989 Jan; 24(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 2524574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(4):145-50. PubMed ID: 2701173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study of the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the radiographic images of the amelocemental junction and simulated alveolar crest.
    Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Addy M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Nov; 19(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 1469498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic amelocemental junction and alveolar crest: effect of X-ray beam angulation.
    Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Newcombe RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Sep; 22(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 7490667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of simulated osteoporosis in maxillae using radiographic texture analysis.
    Southard TE; Southard KA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Feb; 43(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 8682523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone. A possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis.
    Ruttimann UE; Webber RL; Hazelrig JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Jul; 74(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 1508517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise in D- and E-speed radiographic film.
    Southard TE; Southard KA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jun; 75(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 8515992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiometric classification of alveolar bone health.
    Hildebolt CF; Zerbolio DJ; Shrout MK; Ritzi S; Gravier MJ
    J Dent Res; 1992 Sep; 71(9):1594-7. PubMed ID: 1522291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.