These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding. Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. Mol A; Dunn SM J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 12753368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of X-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic assessment of alveolar crest level. Zulqarnain BJ; Almas K Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(4):132-8. PubMed ID: 10530200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images. Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic absorptiometry method in measurement of localized alveolar bone density changes. Kuhl ED; Nummikoski PV Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 10710466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of a new software in eliminating the angulation errors in digital subtraction radiography. Güneri P; Göğüş S; Tuğsel Z; Boyacioğlu H Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):484-9. PubMed ID: 18033945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography. Wenzel A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(4):145-50. PubMed ID: 2701173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro study of the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the radiographic images of the amelocemental junction and simulated alveolar crest. Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Addy M J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Nov; 19(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 1469498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]