These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8677805)

  • 1. Inattention and the perception of visual feature conjunctions.
    Modigliani V; Wright RD; Loverock DS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Mar; 91(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8677805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attribute conjunctions and the part configuration advantage in object category learning.
    Saiki J; Hummel JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Jul; 22(4):1002-19. PubMed ID: 8708600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.
    Ashby FG; Prinzmetal W; Ivry R; Maddox WT
    Psychol Rev; 1996 Jan; 103(1):165-92. PubMed ID: 8650297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Color diagnosticity in object recognition.
    Tanaka JW; Presnell LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1140-53. PubMed ID: 10497433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual feature integration and focused attention: response competition from multiple distractor features.
    Lavie N
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 9158329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of colour congruency on shape discriminations of novel objects.
    Nicholson KG; Humphrey GK
    Perception; 2004; 33(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 15176618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens.
    Kanwisher N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):404-21. PubMed ID: 1830084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects.
    Bonnel AM; Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jan; 60(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 9503916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects.
    Lacey S; Campbell C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):361-76. PubMed ID: 16618639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The time course of perception and retrieval in matching and recognition.
    Kent C; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):920-31. PubMed ID: 16846288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
    Wolfe JM; Cave KR; Franzel SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 2527952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 19451380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks.
    Wolfe JM; Friedman-Hill SR; Bilsky AB
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):537-50. PubMed ID: 8008555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic versus perceptual influences of color in object recognition.
    Joseph JE; Proffitt DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):407-29. PubMed ID: 8901343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration trumps selection in object recognition.
    Saarela TP; Landy MS
    Curr Biol; 2015 Mar; 25(7):920-7. PubMed ID: 25802154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task.
    Mounts JR; Melara RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Illusory conjunctions are alive and well: a reply to Donk (1999).
    Prinzmetal W; Diedrichsen J; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):538-41. PubMed ID: 11424643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic access to object identity: attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW; Lorenceau J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):584-601. PubMed ID: 7790835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.