561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8677807)
1. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors involved in the high radiographic sensitivity of E-speed films.
Domon M; Yoshino N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Jan; 69(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 2296442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Structure of medical X-ray films].
Okano T; Kikuchi A
Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Mar; 28(1 Pt 1):195-202. PubMed ID: 2135104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose to tissue medium or water cavities as surrogate for the dose to cell nuclei at brachytherapy photon energies.
Enger SA; Ahnesjö A; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4489-500. PubMed ID: 22722477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of the x-ray mass energy-absorption coefficient of air using 3 keV to 10 keV synchrotron radiation.
Büermann L; Grosswendt B; Kramer HM; Selbach HJ; Gerlach M; Hoffmann M; Krumrey M
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5125-50. PubMed ID: 17019029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy dependent calibration of XR-QA2 radiochromic film with monochromatic and polychromatic x-ray beams.
Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Sarno A; Tromba G; Tomic N; Devic S; Russo P
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):583. PubMed ID: 26745950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corrections to air kerma and exposure measured with free air ionisation chambers for charge of photoelectrons, Compton electrons and Auger electrons.
Takata N; Begum A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 18397932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photon extremity absorbed dose and kerma conversion coefficients for calibration geometries.
Veinot KG; Hertel NE
Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 17220720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Air kerma rate constants for gamma emitters used most often in practice.
Ninkovic MM; Raicevic JJ; Adrovic F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):247-50. PubMed ID: 16381721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A robust method for determining the absorbed dose to water in a phantom for low-energy photon radiation.
Schneider T
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(11):3387-402. PubMed ID: 21572183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra.
Kellerer AM; Roos H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15695239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film.
Sutherland JG; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1110-6. PubMed ID: 20384246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parameterized algorithms for quantitative differentials in spectrally equivalent medical diagnostic x-ray beams.
Okunade AA
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1785-95. PubMed ID: 16013736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
