441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8677807)
21. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Independence of calibration curves for EBT Gafchromic films of the size of high-energy X-ray fields.
Cheung T; Butson MJ; Yu PK
Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 Sep; 64(9):1027-30. PubMed ID: 16774834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
Persliden J; Fransson V; Vitak B; Fagerberg G
Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mapping radiation quality inside photon-irradiated absorbers by means of a twin-chamber method.
Chofor N; Harder D; Looe HK; Kapsch RP; Kollhoff R; Willborn K; Rühmann A; Poppe B
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):252-63. PubMed ID: 19962083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetric characterization of GafChromic EBT film and its implication on film dosimetry quality assurance.
Fuss M; Sturtewagen E; De Wagter C; Georg D
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4211-25. PubMed ID: 17664604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Calculation of conversion coefficients for clinical photon spectra using the MCNP code.
Lima MA; Silva AX; Crispim VR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15367760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiographic and fluoroscopic X-ray systems: Quality control of the X-ray tube and automatic exposure control using theoretical spectra to determine air kerma and dose to a homogenous phantom.
Konst B; Nøtthellen J; Bilet E; Båth M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 22(8):204-218. PubMed ID: 34196461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dose and energy dependence of response of Gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
Rampado O; Garelli E; Deagostini S; Ropolo R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2871-81. PubMed ID: 16723772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammographic x-ray unit kilovoltage test tool based on k-edge absorption effect.
Napolitano ME; Trueblood JH; Hertel NE; David G
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2169-76. PubMed ID: 12349939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Measurements of absolute energy spectra for an industrial micro focal X-ray source under working conditions using a Compton scattering spectrometer.
Hammersberg P; Stenström M; Hedtjärn H; Mångård M
J Xray Sci Technol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 22388423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Specification of absorbed dose to water using model-based dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in brachytherapy.
Tedgren ÅC; Carlsson GA
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(8):2561-79. PubMed ID: 23528349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low-energy photons in high-energy photon fields--Monte Carlo generated spectra and a new descriptive parameter.
Chofor N; Harder D; Willborn K; Rühmann A; Poppe B
Z Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 21(3):183-97. PubMed ID: 21530198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
