These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8677807)

  • 41. Measurements of absolute energy spectra for an industrial micro focal X-ray source under working conditions using a Compton scattering spectrometer.
    Hammersberg P; Stenström M; Hedtjärn H; Mångård M
    J Xray Sci Technol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 22388423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Specification of absorbed dose to water using model-based dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in brachytherapy.
    Tedgren ÅC; Carlsson GA
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(8):2561-79. PubMed ID: 23528349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Low-energy photons in high-energy photon fields--Monte Carlo generated spectra and a new descriptive parameter.
    Chofor N; Harder D; Willborn K; Rühmann A; Poppe B
    Z Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 21(3):183-97. PubMed ID: 21530198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Physical mechanism of the Schwarzschild effect in film dosimetry--theoretical model and comparison with experiments.
    Djouguela A; Kollhoff R; Rühmann A; Willborn KC; Harder D; Poppe B
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4345-56. PubMed ID: 16912385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accounting for the variation in collision kerma-to-terma ratio in polyenergetic photon beam convolution.
    Hoban PW
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2035-44. PubMed ID: 8746709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Silver fluorescent x-ray yield and its influence on the dose rate constant for nine low-energy brachytherapy source models.
    Nath R; Chen ZJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3785-93. PubMed ID: 17985624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dosimetry of ultrasoft x-rays (1.5 keV Al(Kalpha)) using radiochromatic films and colour scanners.
    Cai Z; Pan X; Hunting D; Cloutier P; Lemay R; Sanche L
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 48(24):4111-24. PubMed ID: 14727755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Response of air, silicon and dosimetric films to x-ray spectra of various qualities.
    Paix D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Dec; 15(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 1482340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
    Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Calculation of x-ray spectra emerging from an x-ray tube. Part I. electron penetration characteristics in x-ray targets.
    Poludniowski GG; Evans PM
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2164-74. PubMed ID: 17654919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Extrapolation Ionization Chamber Dosimetry of Fluorescent X-Ray Energies from 4.5 to 19.6 keV.
    Rakowski JT; Tucker MA; Snyder MG; Makar SP; Yudele M; Burmeister J; Joiner MC
    Radiat Res; 2016 Sep; 186(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27548518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of conversion coefficients relating air-kerma to H*(10) using primary and transmitted x-ray spectra in the diagnostic radiology energy range.
    Santos JC; Mariano L; Tomal A; Costa PR
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Mar; 36(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 26835613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7835508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Patient radiation dose management in dental facilities according to the X-ray focal distance and the image receptor type.
    Gonzalez L; Moro J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):282-4. PubMed ID: 17586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Dose measurement and risk evaluation in intraoral periapical radiography].
    Chiu PC; Yan YH; Lin SH; Chang PS
    Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Oct; 10(10):565-77. PubMed ID: 7807613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Calculation of effective dose.
    McCollough CH; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):828-37. PubMed ID: 10841384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [An absorbed dose conversion factor due to the x-ray spectrum compare with the method by the half-value layer].
    Tachibana M; Izumi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Mar; 58(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 12522346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Organ Dose Reconstruction Applicable for a Japanese Nuclear Worker Cohort: J-EPISODE.
    Furuta H; Sato K; Nishide A; Kudo S; Saigusa S
    Health Phys; 2021 Nov; 121(5):471-483. PubMed ID: 34591819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of five methods for the derivation of spectra for a constant potential dental X-ray unit.
    Lankipalli BR; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Wieckowska E; Waggener RG; Mercier JR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):264-9. PubMed ID: 11571546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.