These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8678052)

  • 1. Optimizing power in allocating resources to exposure assessment in an epidemiologic study.
    Armstrong BG
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Jul; 144(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 8678052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study design for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Armstrong B
    Sci Total Environ; 1995 Jun; 168(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 7481737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiology needs and perspectives in environmental epidemiology.
    Buffler PA
    Arch Environ Health; 1988; 43(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 3377546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invited commentary: old problem, new wrinkles.
    Potter JD
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 May; 147(10):911-3. PubMed ID: 9596468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles of study design in environmental epidemiology.
    Morgenstern H; Thomas D
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):23-38. PubMed ID: 8206038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles.
    Wacholder S; McLaughlin JK; Silverman DT; Mandel JS
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 May; 135(9):1019-28. PubMed ID: 1595688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Sep; 10(8):329-31. PubMed ID: 12964336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing cost-efficiency in mean exposure assessment--cost functions reconsidered.
    Mathiassen SE; Bolin K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():76. PubMed ID: 21600023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure measurement error: influence on exposure-disease. Relationships and methods of correction.
    Thomas D; Stram D; Dwyer J
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():69-93. PubMed ID: 8323607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The design of prospective epidemiological studies: more subjects or better measurements?
    Phillips AN; Smith GD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 46(10):1203-11. PubMed ID: 8410105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.
    Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too many cohorts and repeated measurements are a waste of resources.
    Tekle FB; Tan FE; Berger MP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1383-90. PubMed ID: 21592727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and interpretation of studies of differential exposure measurement error.
    White E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Mar; 157(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 12615602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empowering research: statistical power in general practice research.
    Fox N; Mathers N
    Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 14(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 9283855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning.
    Fox MP; Lash TL
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 43():32-36. PubMed ID: 32113733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure measurement in cohort studies: the challenges of prospective data collection.
    White E; Hunt JR; Casso D
    Epidemiol Rev; 1998; 20(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 9762508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.