These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8678349)

  • 1. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases.
    Bailey LT; Esmailnejad A; Almeida MA
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 8678349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts.
    Almeida MA; Phillips C; Kula K; Tulloch C
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 7726462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical growth-related changes in the positions of palatal rugae and maxillary incisors.
    Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18174076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antero-posterior and transverse changes in the positions of palatal rugae after rapid maxillary expansion.
    Damstra J; Mistry D; Cruz C; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 19336629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing the reliability of palatal rugae pattern in individual identification (following orthodontic treatment).
    Shukla D; Chowdhry A; Bablani D; Jain P; Thapar R
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2011 Jul; 29(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 21841265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Palatal rugae area: a landmark for analysis of pre- and post-orthodontically treated adult Egyptian patients.
    Abdel-Aziz HM; Sabet NE
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):60-6. PubMed ID: 12596953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional biometric study of palatine rugae in children with a mixed-model analysis: a 9-year longitudinal study.
    Kim HK; Moon SC; Lee SJ; Park YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 22554753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.
    Jang I; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Iijima S; Yozgatian JH; Cha BK; Yoshida N
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 19413387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 24485736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.
    Lee SJ; Kim TW; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 16769492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
    Aksu M; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements.
    Hoggan BR; Sadowsky C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 11343019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Kumari M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profound approach to check legitimacy of an old technique used to gauge palatal rugae.
    Gupta B; Gupta S; Jafer M; Quadri F; Raj AT; Patil S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):179-188. PubMed ID: 32031092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional dental arch and palatal form changes after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Part 2. Palatal volume and height.
    Heiser W; Niederwanger A; Bancher B; Bittermann G; Neunteufel N; Kulmer S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 15224063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.