621 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8679736)
1. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case of fat necrosis after breast quadrantectomy in which preoperative diagnosis was enabled by MRI with fat suppression technique.
Iwasaki H; Morimoto K; Koh M; Okamura T; Wakasa K; Wakasa T; Kinoshita H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 22(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 15010123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of the breast--present indications.
Van Ongeval C
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 10859904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint].
Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Becker H; Fischer U
Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1460-8. PubMed ID: 10637703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical oncologic perspective on breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Bloom S; Morrow M
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):277-94, ix. PubMed ID: 20494312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of MR mammography on surgical procedure in operative treatment of breast cancer].
Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Fischer U; Becker H
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115():1488-90. PubMed ID: 9931920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.
Preda L; Villa G; Rizzo S; Bazzi L; Origgi D; Cassano E; Bellomi M
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(5):R53. PubMed ID: 16959028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [MR mammography: current status and indications].
Umschaden HW; Haselbach H
Acta Med Austriaca; 1997; 24(2):39-45. PubMed ID: 9273806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
Belli P; Pastore G; Romani M; Terribile D; Canadè A; Costantini M
Rays; 2002; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
