These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8681536)

  • 41. Testing with fine fragrances in eczema patients: results and test methods.
    Johansen JD; Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 May; 44(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 11298698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Polyvalent type IV sensitizations to multiple fragrances and a skin protection cream in a metal worker.
    Tanko Z; Shab A; Diepgen TL; Weisshaar E
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2009 Jun; 7(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 19243479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Testing with fragrance mix. Is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful?
    Frosch PJ; Pilz B; Burrows D; Camarasa JG; Lachapelle JM; Lahti A; Menné T; Wilkinson JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 May; 32(5):266-72. PubMed ID: 7634779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix.
    de Groot AC; van der Kley AM; Bruynzeel DP; Meinardi MM; Smeenk G; van Joost T; Pavel S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Mar; 28(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 8462288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens.
    Katsarma G; Gawkrodger DJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10515097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the fragrance mix in the European standard series.
    Hendriks SA; van Ginkel CJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 10475516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
    Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
    Trattner A; David M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Occupational contact dermatitis due to "bath bombs".
    Antelmi A; Sukakul T; Mowitz M; Svedman C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Sep; 83(3):247-249. PubMed ID: 32356412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
    Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics containing Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil)].
    Fritz TM; Burg G; Krasovec M
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2001 Feb; 128(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 11275586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
    Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sensitization to fragrance materials in Indonesian cosmetics.
    Roesyanto-Mahadi ID; Geursen-Reitsma AM; van Joost T; van den Akker TW
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 2347175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Majantol.
    Herro E; Jacob SE
    Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 21504697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test® and Trolab® test material.
    Mortz CG; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):248-53. PubMed ID: 20946453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Allergic contact dermatitis to personal care products and topical medications in adults with atopic dermatitis.
    Rastogi S; Patel KR; Singam V; Silverberg JI
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Dec; 79(6):1028-1033.e6. PubMed ID: 30053491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde.
    Hauksson I; Pontén A; Isaksson M; Hamada H; Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Mar; 74(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 26696132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Patch test for the detection of contact allergens.
    Akhtar N; Rashid MM; Chowdhury AQ; Ali E; Chowdhury AM
    Mymensingh Med J; 2004 Jul; 13(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 15284698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Non-mix fragrances are top sensitizers in consecutive dermatitis patients - a cross-sectional study of the 26 EU-labelled fragrance allergens.
    Bennike NH; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):270-279. PubMed ID: 28511284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Increase in contact allergy to fragrances: patch-test results 1989-1998.
    Lunder T; Kansky A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 10945750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.