These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8681542)

  • 1. Irritant effects of a detergent in wash, chamber and repeated open application tests.
    Hannuksela A; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 8681542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irritant effects of a detergent in wash and chamber tests.
    Hannuksela A; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Mar; 32(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 7774189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate irritant reactions to benzoic acid are enhanced in washed skin areas.
    Lahti A; Pylvänen V; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 8565459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The irritant potential of n-propanol (nonanoic acid vehicle) in cumulative skin irritation: a validation study of two different human in vivo test models.
    Clemmensen A; Andersen F; Petersen TK; Kalden H; Melgaard A; Andersen KE
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 19159372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
    Lee CH; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patch test study with calcipotriol ointment in different patient groups, including psoriatic patients with and without adverse dermatitis.
    Fullerton A; Avnstorp C; Agner T; Dahl JC; Olsen LO; Serup J
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1996 May; 76(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 8800298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection.
    Pedersen LK; Held E; Johansen JD; Agner T
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Dec; 153(6):1142-6. PubMed ID: 16307649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
    Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
    Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Barrier function and natural moisturizing factor levels after cumulative exposure to a fruit-derived organic acid and a detergent: different outcomes in atopic and healthy skin and relevance for occupational contact dermatitis in the food industry.
    Angelova-Fischer I; Hoek AK; Dapic I; Jakasa I; Kezic S; Fischer TW; Zillikens D
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Dec; 73(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 26426984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation.
    Slotosch CM; Kampf G; Löffler H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 17868216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sodium lauryl sulfate effect on the density of epidermal Langerhans cells. Evaluation of different test models.
    Mikulowska A; Andersson A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 8879924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allergic and irritant patch test reactions and atopic disease.
    Klas PA; Corey G; Storrs FJ; Chan SC; Hanifin JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 8681540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on sensitive skin.
    Piérard GE; Arrese JE; Rodríguez C; Daskaleros PA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):286-91. PubMed ID: 8088143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allergic contact dermatitis to detergents: a multicenter study to assess prevalence.
    Belsito DV; Fransway AF; Fowler JF; Sherertz EF; Maibach HI; Mark JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Storrs FJ; Nethercott JR
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2002 Feb; 46(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 11807430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The repeated open application test (ROAT).
    Hannuksela M; Salo H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 2941220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How irritant is alcohol?
    Löffler H; Kampf G; Schmermund D; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 157(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17578437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Murine auricular transepidermal water loss -- a novel approach for evaluating irritant skin reaction in mice.
    Löffler H; Hoffmann R; Happle R; Effendy I
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2001 Mar; 26(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 11298115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ranking of surfactant skin irritancy in vivo in man using the plastic occlusion stress test (POST).
    Berardesca E; Fideli D; Gabba P; Cespa M; Rabbiosi G; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2401138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.