These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8681928)

  • 1. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
    Kumar S; Garand D
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jul; 41(7):1050-9. PubMed ID: 9674377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of box weight, vertical location and symmetry on lifting capacities and ratings on category scale in Japanese female workers.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Shibata E; Ando S; Hori F; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 2000 Dec; 43(12):2031-42. PubMed ID: 11191784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement and prediction of isometric lifting strength in symmetrical and asymmetrical postures.
    Sanchez D; Grieve DW
    Ergonomics; 1992 Jan; 35(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 1544360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shrinkage and psychophysical load ratings in self-paced and force-paced lifting work and during recovery.
    Stålhammar HR; Leskinen TP; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992 Jan; 35(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1544359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of lifting tasks performed on laterally slanted ground surfaces.
    Jiang Z; Shin G; Freeman J; Reid S; Mirka GA
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(7):782-95. PubMed ID: 16076737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanically and electromyographically assessed load on the spine in self-paced and force-paced lifting work.
    Leskinen TP; Stålhammar HR; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):881-8. PubMed ID: 1633794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manual materials handling in mining: the effect of rod heights and foot positions when lifting "in-the-hole" drill rods.
    Plamondon A; Delisle A; Trimble K; Desjardins P; Rickwood T
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):709-18. PubMed ID: 16545338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.