These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8682516)

  • 1. Kinematics, kinetics, and psychophysical perceptions in symmetric and twisting pushing and pulling tasks.
    Resnick ML; Chaffin DB
    Hum Factors; 1996 Mar; 38(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 8682516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks.
    Weston EB; Aurand A; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2018 Jun; 61(6):853-865. PubMed ID: 29241415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association between spinal loads and the psychophysical determination of maximum acceptable force during pushing tasks.
    Le P; Dufour J; Monat H; Rose J; Huber Z; Alder E; Radin Umar RZ; Hennessey B; Dutt M; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1104-14. PubMed ID: 22676341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Research progresses on ergonomics assessment and measurement methods for push-pull behavior].
    Zhao Y; Li D; Guo S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 28(5):1052-6. PubMed ID: 22097282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial force and postural adaptations when pushing and pulling on floor surfaces with good and reduced resistance to slipping.
    Boocock MG; Haslam RA; Lemon P; Thorpe S
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):801-21. PubMed ID: 16801229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cut-points to prevent low back injury due to force exertion at work.
    Vieira ER; Kumar S
    Work; 2006; 27(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 16873983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of ergonomic devices on mechanical load during patient handling activities in nursing homes.
    Koppelaar E; Knibbe HJ; Miedema HS; Burdorf A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(6):708-18. PubMed ID: 22393034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A thorough investigation on pushing activities in industry: The impact of the variation in the speed of motion and load conditions on initial and sustained forces.
    Botti L; Galizia FG; Mora C; Zecchi G
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103080. PubMed ID: 32174340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FMS™ scores and low-back loading during lifting--whole-body movement screening as an ergonomic tool?
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):482-9. PubMed ID: 23876984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions.
    Marras WS; Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 10877482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ergonomic evaluation of handle height and load in maximal and submaximal cart pushing.
    Resnick ML; Chaffin DB
    Appl Ergon; 1995 Jun; 26(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 15677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
    Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pushing and pulling: an assessment tool for occupational health and safety practitioners.
    Lind CM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Mar; 24(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 27892832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of transfer distance on spine kinematics when placing boxes at different heights.
    Kim TH; Mehta JP; Weiler MR; Lavender SA
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):936-42. PubMed ID: 24332826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a powered drive on pushing and pulling forces when transporting bariatric hospital beds.
    Wiggermann N
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():59-65. PubMed ID: 27633198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression models for predicting peak and continuous three-dimensional spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Fathallah FA; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 10665206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of an on-body lifting aid at reducing low back physical demands during an automotive assembly task: assessment of EMG response and user acceptability.
    Graham RB; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Sep; 40(5):936-42. PubMed ID: 19223026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of push handle height on net moments and forces on the musculoskeletal system during standardized wheelchair pushing tasks.
    Van Der Woude LH; Van Koningsbruggen CM; Kroes AL; Kingma I
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1995 Dec; 19(3):188-201. PubMed ID: 8927531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manual handling: differences in perceived effort, success rate and kinematics between three different pushing techniques.
    Varcin L; Claus A; van den Hoorn W; Hodges P
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 25343518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.