These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8682533)

  • 1. Distinguishing between activated and nonactivated eosinophils by AC impedance measurements.
    Lacy F; Kadima-Nzuji M; Malveaux FJ; Carter EL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Feb; 43(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 8682533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography.
    Rahal M; Khor JM; Demosthenous A; Tizzard A; Bayford R
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S73-84. PubMed ID: 19491443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of the optimum level of electrode placement for the evaluation of absolute lung resistivity with the Mk3.5 EIT system.
    Nebuya S; Noshiro M; Yonemoto A; Tateno S; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Milnes P
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S129-37. PubMed ID: 16636404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A detailed model for high-frequency impedance characterization of ovarian cancer epithelial cell layer using ECIS electrodes.
    Rahman AR; Lo CM; Bhansali S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 19272881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
    Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the sensitivity and frequency characteristics of coplanar electrical cell-substrate impedance sensors.
    Wang L; Wang H; Wang L; Mitchelson K; Yu Z; Cheng J
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2008 Sep; 24(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 18511255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic detection of detached and erroneous electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Asfaw Y; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S175-83. PubMed ID: 15798230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical computation of impedances of a human tooth for estimation of the root canal length.
    Krizaj D; Jan J; Valencic V
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jul; 49(7):746-8. PubMed ID: 12083312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Simulation study of line electrode for electrical impedance tomography].
    Wang Y; Sha H; Ren C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 18027681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of emboli in vessels using electrical impedance measurements--phantom and electrodes.
    Nebuya S; Noshiro M; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Milnes P
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S111-8. PubMed ID: 15798224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-chip micro-biosensor for the detection of human CD4(+) cells based on AC impedance and optical analysis.
    Mishra NN; Retterer S; Zieziulewicz TJ; Isaacson M; Szarowski D; Mousseau DE; Lawrence DA; Turner JN
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Nov; 21(5):696-704. PubMed ID: 16242607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A probe for organ impedance measurement.
    Paulson KS; Pidcock MK; McLeod CN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Oct; 51(10):1838-44. PubMed ID: 15490831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A multichannel device for the noninvasive analysis of the state and function of organs and tissues].
    Thiel F; Hartung C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Sep; 49(9):233-7. PubMed ID: 15493130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
    Gandhi SV; Walker DC; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach for detection of leg movement using segmental electrical impedance changes.
    Song CG; Seo JH; Kim KS; Youn DY; Kim DW
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15764382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
    Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Apr; 45(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 9556965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum electrode configuration for detection of leg movement using bio-impedance.
    Song CG; Kim SC; Nam KC; Kim DW
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S59-68. PubMed ID: 15798247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.