These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8682541)

  • 1. A high-order coupled finite element/boundary element torso model.
    Pullan A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 8682541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The computational performance of a high-order coupled FEM/BEM procedure in electropotential problems.
    Bradley CP; Harris GM; Pullan AJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1238-50. PubMed ID: 11686623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of errors in assumed conductivities and geometry on numerical solutions to the inverse problem of electrocardiography.
    Throne RD; Olson LG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1192-200. PubMed ID: 8550061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Membrane polarization induced in the myocardium by defibrillation fields: an idealized 3-D finite element bidomain/monodomain torso model.
    Huang Q; Eason JC; Claydon FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Jan; 46(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 9919823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of inhomogeneities and anisotropies on electrocardiographic fields: a 3-D finite-element study.
    Klepfer RN; Johnson CR; Macleod RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Aug; 44(8):706-19. PubMed ID: 9254984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The combination method: a numerical technique for electrocardiographic calculations.
    Stanley PC; Pilkington TC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Apr; 36(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 2714825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of variable thickness and fiber orientation of the skeletal muscle layer on electrocardiographic calculations.
    Stanley PC; Pilkington TC; Morrow MN; Ideker RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Nov; 38(11):1069-76. PubMed ID: 1748441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lead field computation for the electrocardiographic inverse problem--finite elements versus boundary elements.
    Seger M; Fischer G; Modre R; Messnarz B; Hanser F; Tilg B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Mar; 77(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 15721652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of geometric and topologic differences in boundary element models on magnetocardiographic localization accuracy.
    Pesola K; Lötjönen J; Nenonen J; Magnin IE; Lauerma K; Fenici R; Katila T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Sep; 47(9):1237-47. PubMed ID: 11008425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solving the ECG forward problem by means of a meshless finite element method.
    Li ZS; Zhu SA; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):N287-96. PubMed ID: 17664567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A convenient scheme for coupling a finite element curvilinear mesh to a finite element voxel mesh: application to the heart.
    Hopenfeld B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():60. PubMed ID: 17112373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Simulation of inverse recovery of epicardial potentials under incomplete boundary conditions].
    Huang S; He W; Yao D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 21(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 15357424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decoupled time-marching schemes in computational cardiac electrophysiology and ECG numerical simulation.
    Fernández MA; Zemzemi N
    Math Biosci; 2010 Jul; 226(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 20416327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An operator splitting method for solving the bidomain equations coupled to a volume conductor model for the torso.
    Sundnes J; Lines GT; Tveito A
    Math Biosci; 2005 Apr; 194(2):233-48. PubMed ID: 15854678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of stochastic finite element methods to study the sensitivity of ECG forward modeling to organ conductivity.
    Geneser SE; Kirby RM; MacLeod RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 18232344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards accurate numerical method for monodomain models using a realistic heart geometry.
    Belhamadia Y; Fortin A; Bourgault Y
    Math Biosci; 2009 Aug; 220(2):89-101. PubMed ID: 19447119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Solving the ECG forward problem by means of standard h- and h-hierarchical adaptive linear boundary element method: comparison with two refinement schemes.
    Shou G; Xia L; Jiang M; Wei Q; Liu F; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1454-64. PubMed ID: 19272882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A generalized finite difference method for modeling cardiac electrical activation on arbitrary, irregular computational meshes.
    Trew ML; Smaill BH; Bullivant DP; Hunter PJ; Pullan AJ
    Math Biosci; 2005 Dec; 198(2):169-89. PubMed ID: 16140344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cardiac motion on body surface electrocardiographic potentials: an MRI-based simulation study.
    Wei Q; Liu F; Appleton B; Xia L; Liu N; Wilson S; Riley R; Strugnel W; Slaughter R; Denman R; Crozier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3405-18. PubMed ID: 16825739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The electrocardiographic inverse problem.
    Rudy Y; Oster HS
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(1-2):25-45. PubMed ID: 1424685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.