These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8682741)

  • 1. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of errorless learning and backward chaining on the acquisition of Internet skills in adults with developmental disabilities.
    Jerome J; Frantino EP; Sturmey P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 17471803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progressing from programmatic to discovery research: a case example with the overjustification effect.
    Roane HS; Fisher WW; McDonough EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 12723865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.
    Jerome J; Sturmey P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 18595285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.
    Dyer K; Dunlap G; Winterling V
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 2074240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Graff RB; Gibson L
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
    Lalli JS; Casey S; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children.
    Charlop MH; Kurtz PF; Casey FG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 2373653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing on-task behaviour through interruption-prompting.
    Duker PC; Schaapveld M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 1996 Aug; 40 ( Pt 4)():291-7. PubMed ID: 8884583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
    Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.
    Egel AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.
    Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Jann KE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 25891170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
    Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.