299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8682741)
1. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of errorless learning and backward chaining on the acquisition of Internet skills in adults with developmental disabilities.
Jerome J; Frantino EP; Sturmey P
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 17471803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Progressing from programmatic to discovery research: a case example with the overjustification effect.
Roane HS; Fisher WW; McDonough EM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 12723865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.
Jerome J; Sturmey P
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 18595285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.
Dyer K; Dunlap G; Winterling V
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 2074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Graff RB; Gibson L
Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
Lalli JS; Casey S; Kates K
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children.
Charlop MH; Kurtz PF; Casey FG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 2373653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing on-task behaviour through interruption-prompting.
Duker PC; Schaapveld M
J Intellect Disabil Res; 1996 Aug; 40 ( Pt 4)():291-7. PubMed ID: 8884583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.
Egel AL
J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7298543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.
Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Jann KE
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 25891170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
