224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8682836)
21. [Bone remodeling after internal fixation with different stiffness plates: ultrastructural investigation].
Chen YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 29(4):256-9, 272. PubMed ID: 1874119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prophylaxis of infection and effects on osseointegration using a tobramycin-periapatite coating on titanium implants--an experimental study in the rabbit.
Moojen DJ; Vogely HC; Fleer A; Nikkels PG; Higham PA; Verbout AJ; Castelein RM; Dhert WJ
J Orthop Res; 2009 Jun; 27(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 19025776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Should the galvanic combination of titanium and stainless steel surgical implants be avoided?
Høl PJ; Mølster A; Gjerdet NR
Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 18054018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro mechanical comparison of 2.0 and 2.4 limited-contact dynamic compression plates and 2.0 dynamic compression plates of different thicknesses.
Strom AM; Garcia TC; Jandrey K; Huber ML; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(7):824-8. PubMed ID: 20825594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone remodelling after internal fixation with different stiffness plates: ultrastructural investigation.
Chen YQ; Dai KR; Qiu SJ; Zhu ZA
Chin Med J (Engl); 1994 Oct; 107(10):766-70. PubMed ID: 7835104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing.
Miller DL; Goswami T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1049-62. PubMed ID: 17904257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical aspects of infection involving osteosynthesis implants: implant design and resistance to local infection.
Schlegel U; Perren SM
Injury; 2006 May; 37 Suppl 2():S67-73. PubMed ID: 16651074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Local plate infections in a rabbit model.
Johansson A; Lindgren JU; Nord CE; Svensson O
Injury; 1999 Nov; 30(9):587-90. PubMed ID: 10707225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation and comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of teicoplanin- and clindamycin-coated titanium implants: an experimental study.
Aykut S; Oztürk A; Ozkan Y; Yanik K; Ilman AA; Ozdemir RM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 20044697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Results of treating 221 tibial osteosynthesis with narrow dynamic compression plates (DCP) of steel or titanium (author's transl)].
Matter P; Holzach P
Unfallheilkunde; 1977 May; 80(5):195-6. PubMed ID: 867596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of titanium and stainless steel in fracture fixation.
Hayes JS; Richards RG
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Nov; 7(6):843-53. PubMed ID: 21050093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of thermal cycling on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on stainless steel and titanium orthopaedic plates.
Akens MK; Chien C; Katchky RN; Kreder HJ; Finkelstein J; Whyne CM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jul; 19(1):260. PubMed ID: 30049271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Should osteosynthesis plates in the area of the facial skull be removed again? Results of experimental and clinical studies].
Steinhart H; Schroeder HG
HNO; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 7790232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical assessment of titanium and stainless steel posterior spinal constructs: effects of absolute/relative loading and frequency on fatigue life and determination of failure modes.
Stambough JL; Genaidy AM; Huston RL; Serhan H; El-khatib F; Sabri EH
J Spinal Disord; 1997 Dec; 10(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 9438811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Susceptibility to local infection in biological internal fixation. Experimental study of open vs minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in rabbits.
Arens S; Kraft C; Schlegel U; Printzen G; Perren SM; Hansis M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1999; 119(1-2):82-5. PubMed ID: 10076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The comparison of steel and titanium dynamic compression plates used for internal fixation of 256 fractures of the tibia.
Holzach P; Matter P
Injury; 1978 Nov; 10(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 730331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Biomechanic study on length of plate in treatment of tibial shaft fracture].
Hu X; Yang S; Xiao D; Lin B; Wang H; Xu Z; Zhao W; Zhang M
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 22(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19068599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Rigid internal fixation with titanium versus bioresorbable miniplates in the repair of mandibular fractures in rabbits.
Hochuli-Vieira E; Cabrini Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA; Gabrielli MF; Padilha JG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15695046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Release of metal in vivo from stressed and nonstressed maxillofacial fracture plates and screws.
Matthew IR; Frame JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jul; 90(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10884633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
