118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8683303)
1. How to be an effective risk communicator--Part 1.
Donohoe KJ; Brill AB; Brill DR; Conway JJ; Silberstein EB; Whipple C
J Nucl Med; 1996 Jun; 37(6):23N-6N. PubMed ID: 8683303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ionizing radiation. Effect on patient and physician-patient relationship.
Pick RY
N Y State J Med; 1979 Jul; 79(8):1201-4. PubMed ID: 287915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine.
Fahey FH; Treves ST; Adelstein SJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2012 Mar; 40(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 22393223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Units in radiation medicine.
Freshwater DA
J R Army Med Corps; 2004 Sep; 150(3 Suppl 1):10. PubMed ID: 15615104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of the effective dose equivalent to nuclear medicine patients. The MIRD Committee.
Poston JW
J Nucl Med; 1993 Apr; 34(4):714-6. PubMed ID: 8455092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Epidemiology. Radiation dangerous even at lowest doses.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):233. PubMed ID: 16002592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnant patient.
Morin RL; Wagner LK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):470-1. PubMed ID: 17412103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience of the Medical Physics Division of the Dutch Inspectorate of Labour with routine inspections in hospitals.
Meininger WJ
Radiol Clin Biol; 1968; 37(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 5667688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of the effective dose equivalent.
Thomson WH; Chandler ST; Griffiths C
J Nucl Med; 1994 Jan; 35(1):188-9. PubMed ID: 8271049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ionizing radiation.
Voelz GL
Occup Health Saf; 1982 Jul; 51(7):34-7. PubMed ID: 7121951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Low levels of ionising radiation may cause harm.
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 16312035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):26N-32N, 37N. PubMed ID: 11554390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New I-123 nuclear decay data.
Nass HW
J Nucl Med; 1979 Nov; 20(11):1216-7. PubMed ID: 536787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How to be an effective risk communicator.
Donohoe KJ; Brill AB; Brill DR; Conway JJ; Silberstein EB; Whipple C
J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 37(7):20N-22N. PubMed ID: 8965215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Subjects participating in experiments involving exposure to ionizing radiation. Central Scientific Committee].
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Jul; 154(30):2090-1. PubMed ID: 1509586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [How many X-ray examinations do patients tolerate? The National Institute of Radiation Protection's conclusions on the level of knowledge].
Leitz W; Hellström G; Holm LE
Lakartidningen; 1998 May; 95(21):2456-8. PubMed ID: 9640917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NRC simplifies regulations for medical use of byproduct material (10 CFR Part 35).
Frohman JE
J Nucl Med; 1987 Feb; 28(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 3806218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lines from the president: dispelling the confusion about radiation safety in medicine.
Murphy PH
J Nucl Med; 1993 Mar; 34(3):34N, 40N. PubMed ID: 8441022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in the utilization of medical procedures that use ionizing radiation.
Bhargavan M
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):612-27. PubMed ID: 18849695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation protection and safety in medical use of ionising radiation in Republic of Bulgaria--harmonization of the national legislation with Euratom directives.
Ingilizova K; Vassileva J; Rupova I; Pavlova A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):260-2. PubMed ID: 16461505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
