57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8684197)
1. Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care.
Turnbull D; Holmes A; Shields N; Cheyne H; Twaddle S; Gilmour WH; McGinley M; Reid M; Johnstone I; Geer I; McIlwaine G; Lunan CB
Lancet; 1996 Jul; 348(9022):213-8. PubMed ID: 8684197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experiences of maternity care among women at increased risk of preterm birth receiving midwifery continuity of care compared to women receiving standard care: Results from the POPPIE pilot trial.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Silverio SA; Coxon K; Brigante L; Seed PT; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248588. PubMed ID: 33882059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antenatal cardiotocography in primary midwife-led care: Women's satisfaction.
Neppelenbroek EM; Ammerlaan AJM; van der Heijden OWH; van der Pijl MSG; Kaiser A; de Jonge A; Verhoeven CJM
Birth; 2023 Dec; 50(4):798-807. PubMed ID: 37261779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User satisfaction with antenatal care in Norway.
Saetrum A; Kaiser S; Martinussen M
Birth; 2024 Mar; 51(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 37650535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-administration of medications in inpatient postnatal women: an opportunity to empower self-care, improved medicines knowledge and adherence utilising clinical pharmacists and midwifery workforce and use of a midwife formulary.
Wright SA; Higgins C; Carson J; Kinnear M; Smith P; Mary N; Westall E; Arshad S
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2023 Sep; 30(5):279-283. PubMed ID: 34853014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antenatal cardiotocography in primary midwife-led care: a budget impact analysis.
Neppelenbroek E; Jornada Ben Â; Nij Bijvank BSWA; Bosmans JE; Groenen CJM; Jonge A; Verhoeven CJM
BMJ Open Qual; 2024 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38839395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three Careers … and the Evolution of a Midwife to the Soul.
Childs J
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38824051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
Sandall J; Fernandez Turienzo C; Devane D; Soltani H; Gillespie P; Gates S; Jones LV; Shennan AH; Rayment-Jones H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Apr; 4(4):CD004667. PubMed ID: 38597126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science.
Li T; Zeng Y; Fan X; Yang J; Yang C; Xiong Q; Liu P
J Multidiscip Healthc; 2023; 16():677-692. PubMed ID: 36938484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) in a new midwifery model of care in rural South Australia.
Adelson P; Yates R; Fleet JA; McKellar L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Apr; 21(1):368. PubMed ID: 33879145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.
Offerhaus P; Jans S; Hukkelhoven C; de Vries R; Nieuwenhuijze M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):517. PubMed ID: 32894082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes.
Alfirevic Z; Gyte GM; Nogueira Pileggi V; Plachcinski R; Osoti AO; Finucane EM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD007372. PubMed ID: 32852803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sustaining quality midwifery care in a pandemic and beyond.
Renfrew MJ; Cheyne H; Craig J; Duff E; Dykes F; Hunter B; Lavender T; Page L; Ross-Davie M; Spiby H; Downe S
Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102759. PubMed ID: 32485502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Malouf R; Henderson J; Alderdice F
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e022212. PubMed ID: 31320339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrated mental health care in a multidisciplinary maternal and child health service in the community: the findings from the Suzaka trial.
Tachibana Y; Koizumi N; Akanuma C; Tarui H; Ishii E; Hoshina T; Suzuki A; Asano A; Sekino S; Ito H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):58. PubMed ID: 30727996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antenatal care trial interventions: a systematic scoping review and taxonomy development of care models.
Symon A; Pringle J; Downe S; Hundley V; Lee E; Lynn F; McFadden A; McNeill J; Renfrew MJ; Ross-Davie M; van Teijlingen E; Whitford H; Alderdice F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):8. PubMed ID: 28056877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.
Balogun OO; O'Sullivan EJ; McFadden A; Ota E; Gavine A; Garner CD; Renfrew MJ; MacGillivray S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD001688. PubMed ID: 27827515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care.
Symon A; Pringle J; Cheyne H; Downe S; Hundley V; Lee E; Lynn F; McFadden A; McNeill J; Renfrew MJ; Ross-Davie M; van Teijlingen E; Whitford H; Alderdice F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jul; 16(1):168. PubMed ID: 27430506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
Sandall J; Soltani H; Gates S; Shennan A; Devane D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):CD004667. PubMed ID: 27121907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Models of antenatal care to reduce and prevent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Sandall J; Peacock JL
BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e009044. PubMed ID: 26758257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
