These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8684807)

  • 1. Automated perimetry. American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jul; 103(7):1144-51. PubMed ID: 8684807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-pass resolution perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Clinical impressions.
    Lindblom B; Hoyt WF
    Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 1594214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Jampel HD; Singh K; Lin SC; Chen TC; Francis BA; Hodapp E; Samples JR; Smith SD
    Ophthalmology; 2011 May; 118(5):986-1002. PubMed ID: 21539982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerised perimetry.
    Heijl A
    Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962); 1985; 104 ( Pt 1)():76-87. PubMed ID: 3855342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry screening for detecting neuro-ophthalmologic disease.
    Siatkowski RM; Lam BL; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Halikman AM
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jun; 103(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 8643246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry provides additional information to static automated perimetry in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
    Nowomiejska K; Wrobel-Dudzinska D; Ksiazek K; Ksiazek P; Rejdak K; Maciejewski R; Juenemann AG; Rejdak R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25444538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated perimetry: background, instruments and methods.
    Portney GL; Krohn MA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1978; 22(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 635771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perimetry update.
    Leydhecker W
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1983 Jun; 15(6):511-5, 520-1, 524-6 passim. PubMed ID: 6571428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Modern perimetry: automatic or manual?].
    Etienne R; Etienne A; Sellem E
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1983; 6(11):927-32. PubMed ID: 6672066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.