140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8685232)
21. Development of a novel immunohistochemical staining technique (PLATESTAIN technique) based on the capillary action principle.
Kuwao S; Mitomi H; Takahashi E
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Nov; 120(11):1026-31. PubMed ID: 12049104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the ThinPrep processor for fine needle aspiration specimens.
Lee KR; Papillo JL; St John T; Eyerer GJ
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):895-9. PubMed ID: 8842163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of microwave irradiation for immunohistochemistry: a new methodological proposal.
Vitarelli E; Sippelli G; Tuccari G; Barresi G
Histol Histopathol; 1995 Jan; 10(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 7538834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cytomorphology of gastric and duodenal epithelium and reactivity to B72.3: a baseline for comparison to pancreatic lesions aspirated by EUS-FNAB.
Nagle JA; Wilbur DC; Pitman MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 16299750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of the immunocytochemical study of body fluids.
Li CY; Ziesmer SC; Wong YC; Yam LT
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 2675517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ThinPrep vs. conventional smears in fine-needle aspirations of sarcomas: A morphological and immunocytochemical study.
Guiter GE; Gatscha RM; Zakowski MF
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Nov; 21(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 10527484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Immunocytochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor on archival Papanicolaou-stained fine-needle aspirate smears.
Krishnamurthy S; Dimashkieh H; Patel S; Sneige N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Dec; 29(6):309-14. PubMed ID: 14648786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The usefulness of immunostaining in washed cell cytological smears for differential diagnosis of B cell type malignant lymphoma.
Ikeda S; Funakoshi N; Shibata T
Rinsho Byori; 2005 Nov; 53(11):999-1004. PubMed ID: 16372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preparing Cell Smears for Staining.
Rodig SJ
Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2020 Dec; 2020(12):. PubMed ID: 33262235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ThinPrep for cytologic evaluation of follicular thyroid lesions: correlation with histologic findings.
Tulecke MA; Wang HH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 14696138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cytomorphology and B72.3 labeling of benign and malignant ductal epithelium in pancreatic lesions compared to gastrointestinal epithelium.
Nawgiri RS; Nagle JA; Wilbur DC; Pitman MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 May; 35(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 17427224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Immunohistochemical staining on fine needle aspiration biopsy-cell block specimens in the differential diagnosis of lung cancers.
Kulshrestha R; Vijayan VK
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci; 2009; 51(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19317359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immunocytochemistry of cerebrospinal fluid.
Yam LT; English MC; Janckila AJ; Ziesmer S; Li CY
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 3321816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technical aspect of ThinPrep.
Song LH; Goh ES; Phang LC; Poh WT; Tay SK
Singapore Med J; 2000 Dec; 41(12):575-8. PubMed ID: 11296781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Higher diagnostic accuracy with the ThinPrep method in a simulated intraoperative environment.
Ho C; Khalil M; Duggan MA
Cytopathology; 2009 Apr; 20(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 18070111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions: comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations.
Belsley NA; Tambouret RH; Misdraji J; Muzikansky A; Russell DK; Wilbur DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Apr; 36(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 18335553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of gliomas by morphological and immunocytochemical analysis in cell cultures.
Fazekas I; Kerekes E; Hegedús B; Nyáry I
Ideggyogy Sz; 2002 May; 55(5-6):173-9. PubMed ID: 12122877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CD56 expression of neuroendocrine neoplasms on immunophenotyping by flow cytometry: a novel diagnostic approach to fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Farinola MA; Weir EG; Ali SZ
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 12925986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tissue microarrays are an effective quality assurance tool for diagnostic immunohistochemistry.
Hsu FD; Nielsen TO; Alkushi A; Dupuis B; Huntsman D; Liu CL; van de Rijn M; Gilks CB
Mod Pathol; 2002 Dec; 15(12):1374-80. PubMed ID: 12481020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
