354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8685250)
21. A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures.
DeJongh DF; DeJongh EA; Rykalin V; DeFillippo G; Pankuch M; Best AW; Coutrakon G; Duffin KL; Karonis NT; Ordoñez CE; Sarosiek C; Schulte RW; Winans JR; Block AM; Hentz CL; Welsh JS
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7998-8009. PubMed ID: 34739140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Evaluation of the electron density phantom CIRS Model 62].
Pemler P; Schneider U; Besserer J
Z Med Phys; 2001; 11(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11487856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography.
Bourque AE; Carrier JF; Bouchard H
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 59(8):2059-88. PubMed ID: 24694786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region - a phantom study.
Elstrøm UV; Olsen SR; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24975372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of an MR-based multimodal method for molecular composition and proton stopping power ratio determination using
Marants R; Tattenberg S; Scholey J; Kaza E; Miao X; Benkert T; Magneson O; Fischer J; Vinas L; Niepel K; Bortfeld T; Landry G; Parodi K; Verburg J; Sudhyadhom A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37463589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assigning nonelastic nuclear interaction cross sections to Hounsfield units for Monte Carlo treatment planning of proton beams.
Palmans H; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):991-1000. PubMed ID: 15798271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Calibration of CT Hounsfield units for proton therapy treatment planning: use of kilovoltage and megavoltage images and comparison of parameterized methods.
De Marzi L; Lesven C; Ferrand R; Sage J; Boulé T; Mazal A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4255-76. PubMed ID: 23719506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An electron density calibration phantom for CT-based treatment planning computers.
Constantinou C; Harrington JC; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 1992; 19(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 1584125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Range accuracy in carbon ion treatment planning based on CT-calibration with real tissue samples.
Rietzel E; Schardt D; Haberer T
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Mar; 2():14. PubMed ID: 17381831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electron density measurement with dual-energy x-ray CT using synchrotron radiation.
Torikoshi M; Tsunoo T; Sasaki M; Endo M; Noda Y; Ohno Y; Kohno T; Hyodo K; Uesugi K; Yagi N
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(5):673-85. PubMed ID: 12696802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. openPR - A computational tool for CT conversion assessment with proton radiography.
Deffet S; Cohilis M; Souris K; Salvo K; Depuydt T; Sterpin E; Macq B
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):387-396. PubMed ID: 33125725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modeling of body tissues for Monte Carlo simulation of radiotherapy treatments planned with conventional x-ray CT systems.
Kanematsu N; Inaniwa T; Nakao M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(13):5037-50. PubMed ID: 27300449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Verification of CT number to density conversion for a simulator-T attachment.
Chapman A; Butson M; Quach K; Rozenfeld A; Metcalfe P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2002 Jul; 25(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 12219848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simultaneous characterization of electron density and effective atomic number for radiotherapy planning using stoichiometric calibration method and dual energy algorithms.
Tahmasebi Birgani MJ; Mahdavi M; Zabihzadeh M; Lotfi M; Mosleh-Shirazi MA
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Sep; 41(3):601-619. PubMed ID: 29934836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of CT image noise on proton range calculation in radiotherapy planning.
Chvetsov AV; Paige SL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(6):N141-9. PubMed ID: 20182006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
