196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8685341)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction versus T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging in the follow-up of colorectal neoplasm: a prospective study of 41 patients.
Kinkel K; Tardivon AA; Soyer P; Spatz A; Lasser P; Rougier P; Vanel D
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 8685341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging.
Kinkel K; Ariche M; Tardivon AA; Spatz A; Castaigne D; Lhomme C; Vanel D
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9205223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal MR protocol for hepatic hemangiomas. Comparison of conventional spin-echo sequences with T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and serial gradient-echo (FLASH) sequences with gadolinium enhancement.
Kim TK; Choi BI; Han JK; Jang HJ; Han MC
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):565-71. PubMed ID: 9240679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic recurrence from colorectal cancer.
Colosio A; Soyer P; Rousset P; Barbe C; Nguyen F; Bouché O; Hoeffel C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 24311014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plain and gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization.
Castrucci M; Sironi S; De Cobelli F; Salvioni M; Del Maschio A
Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 8875869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of small, functional islet cell tumors in the pancreas: selection of MR imaging sequences for optimal sensitivity.
Thoeni RF; Mueller-Lisse UG; Chan R; Do NK; Shyn PB
Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 10671597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT.
Yamashita Y; Honda S; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 8615260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions: role of spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Hatanaka Y; Yamamoto H; Arakawa A; Matsukawa T; Miyazaki T; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8090922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging.
Guthrie JA; Ward J; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 8888221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study.
Grazioli L; Morana G; Kirchin MA; Schneider G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 15955857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with dynamic MR imaging.
Müller-Schimpfle M; Brix G; Layer G; Schlag P; Engenhart R; Frohmuller S; Hess T; Zuna I; Semmler W; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):881-9. PubMed ID: 8234720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
