134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8685345)
1. Benign and malignant gynecologic disease: clinical importance of fluid and peritoneal enhancement in the pelvis at MR imaging.
Outwater EK; Siegelman ES; Wilson KM; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 8685345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images.
Thurnher SA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Dec; 159(6):1243-50. PubMed ID: 1442393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with dynamic MR imaging.
Müller-Schimpfle M; Brix G; Layer G; Schlag P; Engenhart R; Frohmuller S; Hess T; Zuna I; Semmler W; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):881-9. PubMed ID: 8234720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging.
Guthrie JA; Ward J; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 8888221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Peterson MS; Baron RL; Murakami T
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 8888220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions.
Mahfouz AE; Hamm B; Wolf KJ
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8259426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of peritoneal tumor imaging using conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with different b values.
Bozkurt M; Doganay S; Kantarci M; Yalcin A; Eren S; Atamanalp SS; Yuce I; Yildirgan MI
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20598823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Irradiation of the cervix uteri: value of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Hricak H; Swift PS; Campos Z; Quivey JM; Gildengorin V; Göranson H
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 8210364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plantar fibromatosis: a benign aggressive neoplasm with a characteristic appearance on MR images.
Morrison WB; Schweitzer ME; Wapner KL; Lackman RD
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):841-5. PubMed ID: 7972835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement.
van Gils AP; van den Berg R; Falke TH; Bloem JL; Prins HJ; Dillon EH; van der Mey AG; Pauwels EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 8273654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging.
Seki H; Azumi R; Kimura M; Sakai K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
