These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Peterson MS; Baron RL; Murakami T Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 8888220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions. Mahfouz AE; Hamm B; Wolf KJ Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8259426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of peritoneal tumor imaging using conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with different b values. Bozkurt M; Doganay S; Kantarci M; Yalcin A; Eren S; Atamanalp SS; Yuce I; Yildirgan MI Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20598823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Irradiation of the cervix uteri: value of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Hricak H; Swift PS; Campos Z; Quivey JM; Gildengorin V; Göranson H Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 8210364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plantar fibromatosis: a benign aggressive neoplasm with a characteristic appearance on MR images. Morrison WB; Schweitzer ME; Wapner KL; Lackman RD Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):841-5. PubMed ID: 7972835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement. van Gils AP; van den Berg R; Falke TH; Bloem JL; Prins HJ; Dillon EH; van der Mey AG; Pauwels EK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 8273654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. Seki H; Azumi R; Kimura M; Sakai K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]