These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8686616)

  • 21. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
    Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
    Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Digital radiography: optimization of chest radiographs using a modified exposure control].
    Reichelt S; Oestmann JW; Prokop M; Hagemann G; Knüpfer W; Galanski M
    Rofo; 1991 Feb; 154(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1847538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Report on the 90th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America-- Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hashida M; Yamashita Y; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):974-5. PubMed ID: 16049406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.
    Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH; Winter LH; Chakraborty DP; Schultze Kool LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Value of the AMBER system in interstitial lung changes].
    Dammann F; Sokiranski R; Schäfer C; Brambs HJ; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 7670027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
    Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Development of a digital chest phantom for studies on energy subtraction techniques].
    Hayashi N; Taniguchi A; Noto K; Shimosegawa M; Ogura T; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Mar; 70(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24647055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lung lesions.
    Uffmann M; Prokop M; Eisenhuber E; Fuchsjäger M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2005 May; 40(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 15829821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.