These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8687264)
1. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Rosenfeld KE; Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Connors AF; Dawson NV; Layde P; Califf RM; Liu H; Lynn J; Oye RK Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jul; 156(14):1558-64. PubMed ID: 8687264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults. Goodlin SJ; Zhong Z; Lynn J; Teno JM; Fago JP; Desbiens N; Connors AF; Wenger NS; Phillips RS JAMA; 1999 Dec 22-29; 282(24):2333-9. PubMed ID: 10612321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisions for and against resuscitation in an acute geriatric medicine unit serving the frail elderly. Torian LV; Davidson EJ; Fillit HM; Fulop G; Sell LL Arch Intern Med; 1992 Mar; 152(3):561-5. PubMed ID: 1510746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: insights and clinical implications. Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Teno JM; Oye RK; Dawson NV; Liu H; Califf R; Layde P; Hakim R; Lynn J J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S44-51. PubMed ID: 10809456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences? Marks MA; Arkes HR Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18566485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Older people's reasoning for resuscitation preferences and their role in the decision-making process. Laakkonen ML; Pitkala KH; Strandberg TE; Berglind S; Tilvis RS Resuscitation; 2005 May; 65(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 15866396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional status among survivors of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. SUPPORT Investigators Study to Understand Progress and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. FitzGerald JD; Wenger NS; Califf RM; Phillips RS; Desbiens NA; Liu H; Lynn J; Wu AW; Connors AF; Oye RK Arch Intern Med; 1997 Jan; 157(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 8996043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients 80 years or older: the views of patients and their physicians. O'Donnell H; Phillips RS; Wenger N; Teno J; Davis RB; Hamel MB J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2003; 4(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 12854987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The implications of dying cancer patients' talk on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do-not-resuscitate orders. Eliott JA; Olver IN Qual Health Res; 2007 Apr; 17(4):442-55. PubMed ID: 17416698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hakim RB; Teno JM; Harrell FE; Knaus WA; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Layde P; Califf R; Connors AF; Lynn J Ann Intern Med; 1996 Aug; 125(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 8678391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment: a two-year prospective study of nursing home residents. McParland E; Likourezos A; Chichin E; Castor T; Paris BE BE Mt Sinai J Med; 2003 Mar; 70(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 12634900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders in patients with stroke. Shepardson LB; Youngner SJ; Speroff T; O'Brien RG; Smyth KA; Rosenthal GE Arch Intern Med; 1997 Sep; 157(16):1841-7. PubMed ID: 9290543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing attitudes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a 15-year follow-up study. Cotter PE; Simon M; Quinn C; O'Keeffe ST Age Ageing; 2009 Mar; 38(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 19171950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Living will, resuscitation preferences, and attitudes towards life in an aged population. Laakkonen ML; Pitkala KH; Strandberg TE; Berglind S; Tilvis RS Gerontology; 2004; 50(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 15258431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-hospital cardiac arrest: factors in the decision not to resuscitate. The impact of an organized in-hospital emergency system. Mendes A; Carvalho F; Dias C; Granja C Rev Port Cardiol; 2009 Feb; 28(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 19438149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of do-not-resuscitate and patient care category policies on CPR and ventilator support rates. Davila F Arch Intern Med; 1996 Feb; 156(4):405-8. PubMed ID: 8607725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The frequency of "do-not-resuscitate" order in aged in-patients: effect of patient- and non-patient-related factors. Dautzenberg PL; Bezemer PD; Duursma SA; Schonwetter R; Hooyer C Neth J Med; 1994 Mar; 44(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 8202207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support. American Heart Association Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e989-1004. PubMed ID: 16651298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with the time nurses spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Sulmasy DP; Sood JR Med Care; 2003 Apr; 41(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 12665710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]