140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 868752)
1. OSHA announces proposed cancer policy..
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1977 Apr; 38(4):A24-9. PubMed ID: 868752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Measures for the prevention of occupational cancer.
Weaver NK
J Occup Med; 1976 Sep; 18(9):607-10. PubMed ID: 966092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why the delay in cancer-protection standards?
Rose V
Occup Health Saf; 1977; 46(3):49-50. PubMed ID: 194192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AOMA criticizes OSHA carcinogen proposal.
Occup Health Saf; 1978; 47(5):13. PubMed ID: 692966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The approach used by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to regulate occupational carcinogens.
Rowland R
Med Lav; 1986; 77(4):457-66. PubMed ID: 3784958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. AHA protests OSHA action on nitrous oxide level.
Hospitals; 1979 Oct; 53(20):19. PubMed ID: 478463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise is a prime target at OSHA.
Corn M
Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 181704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational health's future.
Baier EJ
J Occup Med; 1975 Mar; 17(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 1123686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulators and workplace carcinogens.
Yodaiken RE; Jones E; Spolnicki HG; Deitchman S
Occup Med; 1987; 2(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 3306975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The renewed dialogue between science and labor.
Clayman J
Prev Med; 1972 Aug; 1(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 5085005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of carcinogenicity classifications and evaluations: the case of formaldehyde.
Binetti R; Costamagna FM; Marcello I
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 17033133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deficiencies of science and policy in generic cancer regulation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Hoerger FD; Conder JW
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():21-7. PubMed ID: 6942723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Agencies in dispute over cancer policy.
Sun M
Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4556):233. PubMed ID: 7089559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How do you inform labor, management, and other professionals about toxicity data?
Sprout WL
Occup Health Saf; 1978; 47(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 634522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The International Agency for Research on Cancer experience in the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk to humans.
Simonato L; Tomatis L
Med Lav; 1986; 77(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3784938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. I. Recommendations for a benzene standard.
J Occup Med; 1976 Jul; 18(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 940004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Chemical agents and occupational cancer.
Cole P; Merletti F
J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980 Mar; 3(4 Spec No):399-417. PubMed ID: 6993616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical surveillance and biomonitoring for occupational cancer endpoints.
Cone JE; Rosenberg J
Occup Med; 1990; 5(3):563-81. PubMed ID: 2218803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive occupational carcinogen policy as a framework for regulatory activity.
Ruttenberg R; Bingham E
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():13-20. PubMed ID: 6942718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Carcinogens at work: scientific and regulatory aspects. Proceedings of the international conference. Roma, 13-14 June, 1985.
Med Lav; 1986; 77(4):323-479. PubMed ID: 3784937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
