These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8688106)
1. Mathematical modeling of fetal foot growth: use of the Rossavik growth model. Hata T; Senoh D; Hata K; Kitao M Am J Perinatol; 1996 Apr; 13(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 8688106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: II. Adrenal gland. Hata T; Deter RL; Nagata H; Makihara K; Hata K; Kitao M Am J Perinatol; 1993 Mar; 10(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8476489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: IV. Lung. Hata T; Manabe A; Tamaru N; Musa AA; Hata K; Kitao M Am J Perinatol; 1995 Mar; 12(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 7779198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: III. Cardiac ventricle. Manabe A; Hata T; Senoh D; Hata K; Kitao M Am J Perinatol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 7993508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model. V. Cerebellum. Hata T; Senoh D; Hata K; Kitao M Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1996; 42(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 8878709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal liver length measurement does not provide a superior means for prediction of a small for gestational age fetus. Senoh D; Hata T; Kitao M Am J Perinatol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 7993514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The use of Rossavik's mathematical model in determining individual intrauterine growth curves. Our experience]. Biagiotti R; Brizzi L; Cariati E; Puliga AS; Nannini R Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Mar; 46(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 8015703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mathematical modeling of fetal splenic growth: use of the Rossavik growth model. Hata T; Deter RL; Aoki S; Makihara K; Hata K; Kitao M J Clin Ultrasound; 1992 Jun; 20(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 1316374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards. Deter RL; Rossavik IK Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 3658291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual growth patterns in the first trimester: evidence for difference in embryonic and fetal growth rates. Deter RL; Buster JE; Casson PR; Carson SA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 13(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 10079486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal femur length: a critical reevaluation of the relationship to menstrual age. Warda AH; Deter RL; Rossavik IK; Carpenter RJ; Hadlock FP Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 3892390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal foot length: relationship to menstrual age and fetal measurements in the second trimester. Platt LD; Medearis AL; DeVore GR; Horenstein JM; Carlson DE; Brar HS Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 3353042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of obstetric ultrasound to determine the most suitable parameters for the aging of formalin-fixed human fetuses using manual measurements. Croft MS; Desai G; Seed PT; Pollard JI; Perry ME Clin Anat; 1999; 12(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 10089033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of macrosomia by the individual fetal growth curve assessment method. Simon NV; Deter RL; Grow DR; Kofinas AD Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):793-7. PubMed ID: 2014098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Normal fetal growth profile--a uniform model for calculating normal curves for current head and abdomen parameters and long limb bones]. Merz E; Wellek S Ultraschall Med; 1996 Aug; 17(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 8999513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age determination enhanced by embryonic foot bud and foot plate measurements in relation to Carnegie stages, and the influence of maternal cigarette smoking. Lutterodt MC; Rosendahl M; Yding Andersen C; Skouby SO; Byskov AG Hum Reprod; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1825-33. PubMed ID: 19429660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Ariyuki Y; Hata T; Kitao M Pediatrics; 1995 Jul; 96(1 Pt 1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7596719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference values for fetal limb biometry at 10-14 weeks of gestation. De Biasio P; Prefumo F; Lantieri PB; Venturini PL Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):588-91. PubMed ID: 12047539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The fetal femur/foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Campbell J; Henderson A; Campbell S Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Aug; 72(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 3292975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]