These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8688234)

  • 1. Lymph nodes in the hepato-duodenal ligament. A comparison between ultrasound and low-field MR imaging.
    Lyttkens K; Hannesson P; Prytz H; Wallengren NO; Forsberg L
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Jul; 37(4):521-3. PubMed ID: 8688234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound examination in diffuse liver disease. Clinical significance of enlarged lymph nodes in the hepato-duodenal ligament.
    Forsberg L; Florén CH; Hederström E; Prytz H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 2958032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound, hepatic lymph nodes and primary biliary cirrhosis.
    Lyttkens K; Prytz H; Forsberg L; Hederström E; Hägerstrand I
    J Hepatol; 1992 May; 15(1-2):136-9. PubMed ID: 1506630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound examination of lymph nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament.
    Lyttkens K; Forsberg L; Hederström E
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jan; 63(745):26-30. PubMed ID: 2407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymph nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament: US appearances with CT and MR correlation.
    Okada Y; Yao YK; Yunoki M; Sugita T
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Mar; 51(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 8605744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
    Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
    Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound, hepatic lymph nodes and chronic active hepatitis.
    Lyttkens K; Prytz H; Forsberg L; Hederström E; Hägerstrand I
    J Hepatol; 1994 Oct; 21(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 7814804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chronic hepatitis C activity: correlation with lymphadenopathy on MR imaging.
    Zhang XM; Mitchell DG; Shi H; Holland GA; Parker L; Herrine SK; Pasqualin D; Rubin R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 12130443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound detection of abdominal lymph nodes in chronic liver diseases. A retrospective analysis.
    Soresi M; Bonfissuto G; Magliarisi C; Riili A; Terranova A; Di Giovanni G; Bascone F; Carroccio A; Tripi S; Montalto G
    Clin Radiol; 2003 May; 58(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 12727165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical significance of lymphadenopathy in the upper abdomen; ultrasound demonstration].
    Maeda T; Hori Y; Yamaguchi N; Mori H; Hata H; Yamada Y; Tanaka R; Kiyosue H; Takaki H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Mar; 55(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 7746723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Sonographic detection of lymph nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament].
    Dietrich CF; Gottschalk R; Herrmann G; Caspary WF; Zeuzem S
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1997 Oct; 122(42):1269-74. PubMed ID: 9378062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peri-hepatic lymphadenopathy in primary biliary cirrhosis reflects progression of the disease.
    Dietrich CF; Leuschner MS; Zeuzem S; Herrmann G; Sarrazin C; Caspary WF; Leuschner UF
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1999 Jul; 11(7):747-53. PubMed ID: 10445795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
    Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enlarged benign-appearing cervical lymph nodes by ultrasonography are associated with increased likelihood of cancer somewhere within the thyroid in patients undergoing thyroid nodule evaluation.
    Hands KE; Cervera A; Fowler LJ
    Thyroid; 2010 Aug; 20(8):857-62. PubMed ID: 20615130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Periportal lymphadenopathy in patients without identifiable pancreatobiliary or hepatic malignancy.
    Krishna NB; Gardner L; Collins BT; Agarwal B
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Nov; 4(11):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17059897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
    Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Differential diagnostic importance of sonographically detected lymph node enlargement of the liver hilum in non-malignant liver diseases].
    Kathrein H; Vogel W; Dietze B; Judmaier G
    Ultraschall Med; 1989 Jun; 10(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 2672315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings--initial observations.
    Koh DM; Brown G; Temple L; Raja A; Toomey P; Bett N; Norman AR; Husband JE
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 14976266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT.
    Dooms GC; Hricak H; Crooks LE; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):719-28. PubMed ID: 6093190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in combination with routine and dynamic contrast MR imaging.
    Razek AA; Lattif MA; Denewer A; Farouk O; Nada N
    Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 25763535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.