These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8688383)

  • 1. Choice and instrumental delivery.
    Drife JO
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jul; 103(7):608-11. PubMed ID: 8688383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Maillet R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):81. PubMed ID: 17208499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Lurie S; Sadan O; Golan A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.
    Dandolu V; Chatwani A; Harmanli O; Floro C; Gaughan JP; Hernandez E
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 15809773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sequelae for the infants of vacuum extraction operations with the subsequent application of obstetrical forceps].
    Holota VIa; Sonnyk HT; Odarenko IM
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1979; (3):57-9. PubMed ID: 461009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice of instrument for vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 9(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 17208497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Instrumental extraction in 2002 in the "AURORE" hospital network: incidence and serious neonatal complications].
    Dupuis O; Silveira R; Redarce T; Dittmar A; Rudigoz RC
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Nov; 31(11):920-6. PubMed ID: 14623555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative safety of vacuum extraction vs Kielland forceps delivery.
    Driscoll IB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 May; 40(2):226. PubMed ID: 10925919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The practice of instrumental delivery at Kandang Kerbau Hospital in Singapore.
    Vacca A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 May; 40(2):227. PubMed ID: 10925921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the condition of newborn infants delivered by obstetrical forceps and vacuum extraction].
    Gajewska E; Wachnik D; Orlik-Adamska S
    Ginekol Pol; 1985 Feb; 56(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 4043787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal dose of an anesthetic in epidural anesthesia and its effect on labor duration and administration of vacuum extractor and forceps.
    Cutura N; Soldo V; Milovanović SR; Orescanin-Dusić Z; Curković A; Tomović B; Janković-Raznatović S
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 38(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 21995157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of recent trends in vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in the United Kingdom.
    Meniru GI
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 103(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 8616135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pliable obstetrical vacuum cup: application and opinions in The Netherlands.
    Kuit JA; Wallenburg HC; Huikeshoven FJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Apr; 44(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 1316851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist].
    Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.