These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8688718)

  • 21. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
    Edsall JT
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
    Williams N
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Whistle blowing and countersuits: the President's Commission and fraudulent research.
    Shannon TA
    IRB; 1981; 3(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
    Mishkin B
    IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Medical and scientific fraud.
    Robinson RG
    N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):216-7. PubMed ID: 8208480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
    Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
    Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Publication ethics policies for medical journals.
    Pai SA
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2004; 1(3):93. PubMed ID: 16370089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Where next on misconduct?
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):1. PubMed ID: 10078510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misconduct in science: should its definition include mischievous or improper allegations?
    Burgman MA
    Q Rev Biol; 1994 Jun; 69(2):233-5. PubMed ID: 8066177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing.
    Hawley DJ; Jeffers JM
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1992; 24(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1541472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
    Jefferson T
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dealing with deception.
    Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):843. PubMed ID: 8622383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific misconduct: Chinese journals pledge crackdown.
    Wang J
    Science; 1999 Mar; 283(5407):1427. PubMed ID: 11645143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Misconduct in research: editors respond.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):201-2. PubMed ID: 9253258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.