These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8689063)

  • 1. [An additional test in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and some representatives of the genus Vibrio].
    Bril'man IaE
    Klin Lab Diagn; 1995; (3):7-8. PubMed ID: 8689063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization and clinical identification of Enterobacteriaceae by DNA hybridization.
    Brenner DJ
    Prog Clin Pathol; 1978; 7():71-117. PubMed ID: 345354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of a system of multimicrotests for biochemical identification of enterobacteria (MMT E2) in a controlled epidemiological trial. 2].
    Ugrimov SA; Ereshchenko VV; Luzina EV; Shobukhova TS; Parashina VA; Khramova NI; Ershova EB; Mironova IV
    Klin Lab Diagn; 1995; (1):49-51. PubMed ID: 7757370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A PLATE MICROMETHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF ACETOIN PRODUCED BY BACTERIA.
    KOCWA E
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1964; 12():212-7. PubMed ID: 14166660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colonial recognition, a "new" approach for rapid diagnostic enteric bacteriology.
    Finkelstein RA; Punyashthiti K
    J Bacteriol; 1967 Jun; 93(6):1897-905. PubMed ID: 5338180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Apr; 32(4):931-4. PubMed ID: 8027345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE ONPG TEST IN DIAGNOSTIC BACTERIOLOGY. COMPARISON OF THE ONPG TEST AND THE CONVENTIONAL LACTOSE-FERMENTATION TEST.
    BUELOW P
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand; 1964; 60():387-402. PubMed ID: 14123350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two methods for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; Von Kuster LC; Charache P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Sep; 78(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 7051807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Criteria for the determination of fecal enterobacteria].
    Kalina GP
    Gig Sanit; 1979 Dec; (12):52-6. PubMed ID: 391651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Propagation of enterobacteria in the human respiratory tract in chronic otorhinolaryngologic disease].
    Krylov IA; Alkina MSh
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1980 Dec; (12):98-9. PubMed ID: 7013379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some interesting isolates from a diagnostic laboratory.
    Lim PL
    J Clin Pathol; 1978 Mar; 31(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 641196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How far to go with Enterobacteriaceae?
    Ewing WH; Wilfert JN; Kunz LJ; Dumoff M; Isenberg HD
    J Infect Dis; 1969 Feb; 119(2):197-213. PubMed ID: 4887303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Simplified diagnostic scheme for Enterobacteriaceae].
    Neguţ M; Szegli L; Georgescu C; Popovici M; Soare L; Călin C; Florescu E
    Rev Ig Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol Pneumoftiziol Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol; 1977; 22(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 144994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae].
    Scheftel JM; Barth JG; Vincent M
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989; 47(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2665580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolation of Salmonellae and Shigellae from an artificial mixture of fecal bacteria.
    Isenberg HD; Kominos S; Siegel M
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Oct; 18(4):656-9. PubMed ID: 4905039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PLATE MICROMETHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF INDOLE PRODUCED BY BACTERIA.
    KOCWA E
    Acta Microbiol Pol (1952); 1964; 13():355-8. PubMed ID: 14270089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Exposition of technics for the routine diagnosis of enteric bacteria. 1. A Clark-Lubs acetate medium for the Voges-Proskauer reaction].
    Poittevin F; Ould Rouis H; Zoukh K
    Arch Inst Pasteur Alger; 1980; 54():7-18. PubMed ID: 6821481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An additional dehydrogenase or oxidation-reduction test in the classification of enterobacteria].
    Bril'man IaE
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1998; (4):17-9. PubMed ID: 9783392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Vibrio cholerae, and Campylobacter spp. enteropathogens by 3-reaction multiplex polymerase chain reaction.
    Gómez-Duarte OG; Bai J; Newell E
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Jan; 63(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18990527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.