These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8689743)

  • 21. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast material administration protocols for 64-MDCT angiography: altering volume and rate and use of a saline chaser to better match the imaging window--physiologic phantom study.
    Coursey CA; Nelson RC; Weber PW; Howle LE; Nichols EB; Marin D; DeLong D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1568-75. PubMed ID: 19933649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pulmonary masses: contrast enhancement.
    Littleton JT; Durizch ML; Moeller G; Herbert DE
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):861-71. PubMed ID: 2244002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image quality dependence on in-plane positions and directions for MDCT images.
    Hara T; Ichikawa K; Sanada S; Ida Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 19410407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Monte Carlo simulation study of the effect of energy windows in computed tomography images based on an energy-resolved photon counting detector.
    Lee SW; Choi YN; Cho HM; Lee YJ; Ryu HJ; Kim HJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):4931-49. PubMed ID: 22800966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computed tomography (CT) of the lungs of the dog using a helical CT scanner, intravenous iodine contrast medium and different CT windows.
    Cardoso L; Gil F; Ramírez G; Teixeira MA; Agut A; Rivero MA; Arencibia A; Vázquez JM
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):328-31. PubMed ID: 17845220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Actual CT inspection (2): the directions of contrast media, and window setting].
    Tsujioka K; Ida Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Dec; 58(12):1644-52. PubMed ID: 12577025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Brain early infarct detection using gamma correction extreme-level eliminating with weighting distribution.
    Teh V; Sim KS; Wong EK
    Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):842-856. PubMed ID: 27302216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-linear CT windows.
    Gomori JM; Steiner I
    Comput Radiol; 1987; 11(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 3581813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modification of grey scale in computer tomographic images.
    Hemmingsson A; Jung B
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1980; 21(2A):253-5. PubMed ID: 7424561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; Li G; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Okamura K; McDavid WD; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contrast-enhanced conventional CT in patients after surgery for malignant tumors: evaluation of the optimal method of the administration of the contrast medium.
    Wakoh M; Yamada M; Mori T; Shibuya H; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Aug; 41(3):99-107. PubMed ID: 11212587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Rodrigues RS; Bozza FA; Christian PE; Hoffman JM; Butterfield RI; Christensen CR; Heilbrun M; Wiggins RH; Hunt JP; Bentz BG; Hitchcock YJ; Morton KA
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1205-13. PubMed ID: 19617339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computed tomography of neck lymph nodes involved with malignant lymphoma: comparison with ultrasound.
    Sakai F; Sone S; Kiyono K; Maruyama A; Oguchi M; Kawai T; Imai S; Izuno I; Shikama N; Takei K
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):203-8. PubMed ID: 1823393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Observer performance in the assessment of contract enhanced CT: effects of contrast medium and grey scale window on detection of defects in a simulated peripheral rim border.
    Wakoh M; Yamamoto K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 8689743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.