These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 868997)

  • 21. Patient awareness of binocular central scotoma in age-related macular degeneration.
    Fletcher DC; Schuchard RA; Renninger LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1395-8. PubMed ID: 22863789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Swivel arm perimeter for visual field testing in different body positions.
    Flammer J; Hendrickson P; Lietz A; Stümpfig D
    Ophthalmologica; 1993; 206(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 8278154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simplified automatic method for measuring the visual field using the perimeter ZERK 1.
    Koprowski R; Kasprowski P; Rzendkowski M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jul; 15(1):88. PubMed ID: 27456974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of four projection perimeters.
    Portney GL; Hanible JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1976 May; 81(5):678-81. PubMed ID: 1275048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A confrontation test of visual fields in the low-vision patient.
    Pace R; Strong JG
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Jul; 60(7):622-4. PubMed ID: 6614139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields.
    Hollander DA; Volpe NJ; Moster ML; Liu GT; Balcer LJ; Judy KD; Galetta SL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Oct; 84(10):1185-90. PubMed ID: 11004108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.
    Asaoka R; Crabb DP; Yamashita T; Russell RA; Wang YX; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.
    Jampel HD; Friedman DS; Quigley H; Miller R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 11923247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An improved screen for use with the auto-plot perimeter.
    Feldman F; Unger F
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Oct; 12(4):312-4. PubMed ID: 922575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patterns of Binocular Visual Field Loss Derived from Large-Scale Patient Data from Glaucoma Clinics.
    Hu S; Smith ND; Saunders LJ; Crabb DP
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Dec; 122(12):2399-406. PubMed ID: 26391463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increased sensitivity with decreased numbers of test points and decreased test field size in automated perimetry of normal subjects.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Ophthalmologica; 1992; 204(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1594187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Binocular Measures of Visual Acuity and Visual Field versus Binocular Approximations.
    Musch DC; Niziol LM; Gillespie BW; Lichter PR; Janz NK
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):1031-1038. PubMed ID: 28408039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. JO and STATJO: programs for investigating the visual field with the Octopus automatic perimeter.
    Flammer J; Drance SM; Jenni A; Bebie H
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 18(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 6688197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Programmed visual field testing.
    Anderson DR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1982; 80():326-48. PubMed ID: 7182966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Functional scoring of the binocular field.
    Esterman B
    Ophthalmology; 1982 Nov; 89(11):1226-34. PubMed ID: 7155532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability.
    Crabb DP; Viswanathan AC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 243(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 15806374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A simulator for teaching visual field techniques on Goldmann or Goldmann-type perimeters.
    Hass I; Drance SM; Fairclough M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Aug; 88(2):259-60. PubMed ID: 474698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Normal sensitivity of the central quantitative visual field with fundus photo-perimeter].
    Hamano K; Tomonaga M; Miyamoto H; Ohta Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 88(11):1403-8. PubMed ID: 6528839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.