These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8690010)

  • 1. Adjustments of posture and viewing parameters of the eye to changes in the screen height of the visual display terminal.
    Villanueva MB; Sotoyama M; Jonai H; Takeuchi Y; Saito S
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jul; 39(7):933-45. PubMed ID: 8690010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings.
    Seghers J; Jochem A; Spaepen A
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jun; 46(7):714-30. PubMed ID: 12745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postural and muscular responses while viewing different heights of screen.
    Lee TH; Liu TY
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23759195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences.
    Jaschinski W; Heuer H; Kylian H
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jul; 41(7):1034-49. PubMed ID: 9674376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal.
    Villanueva MB; Jonai H; Sotoyama M; Hisanaga N; Takeuchi Y; Saito S
    Ind Health; 1997 Jul; 35(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 9248215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ergonomic evaluation of working posture of VDT operation using personal computer with flat panel display.
    Saito S; Miyao M; Kondo T; Sakakibara H; Toyoshima H
    Ind Health; 1997 Apr; 35(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 9127560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays.
    Shieh KK; Lee DS
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Sep; 38(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 17049333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of body height, notebook computer size, and workstation height on recommended adjustments for proper work posture when operating a notebook computer.
    Nanthavanij S; Jalil S; Ammarapala V
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2008 Dec; 37(2):67-81. PubMed ID: 19227194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual display height.
    Burgess-Limerick R; Mon-Williams M; Coppard VL
    Hum Factors; 2000; 42(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10917150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between head and neck posture and VDT screen height in keyboard operators.
    Kietrys DM; McClure PW; Fitzgerald GK
    Phys Ther; 1998 Apr; 78(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 9555922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of VDT keyboard height and inclination on musculoskeletal discomfort for wheelchair users.
    Wu SP; Yang CH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):535-42. PubMed ID: 15974363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions].
    Gerling J; Ball M; Bömer T; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9644669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes.
    Jaschinski W; Heuer H; Kylian H
    Ergonomics; 1999 Apr; 42(4):535-49. PubMed ID: 10204419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of VDT monitor placement and single versus bifocal glasses on somatic discomfort and postural profiles in data entry tasks.
    Basrai F; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2004 Dec; 33(1-2):29-43. PubMed ID: 17402506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gaze changes with binocular versus monocular viewing in age-related macular degeneration.
    Kabanarou SA; Crossland MD; Bellmann C; Rees A; Culham LE; Rubin GS
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2251-8. PubMed ID: 16996593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of intermittent illumination on a visual inspection task.
    Kennedy A; Brysbaert M; Murray WS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Feb; 51(1):135-51. PubMed ID: 9532965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different seat support characteristics on the neck and trunk muscles and forward head posture of visual display terminal workers.
    Yoo WG; Kim MH
    Work; 2010; 36(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 20555171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations.
    Turville KL; Psihogios JP; Ulmer TR; Mirka GA
    Appl Ergon; 1998 Aug; 29(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 9701537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of visual display distance on eye accommodation, head posture, and vision and neck symptoms.
    Rempel D; Willms K; Anshel J; Jaschinski W; Sheedy J
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):830-8. PubMed ID: 17915601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gaze tracking accuracy in humans: two eyes are better than one.
    Cui Y; Hondzinski JM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 16423465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.