These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8691896)

  • 1. Effect of corrective rearfoot orthotic devices on ground reaction forces during ambulation.
    Miller CD; Laskowski ER; Suman VJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1996 Aug; 71(8):757-62. PubMed ID: 8691896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.
    Nawoczenski DA; Ludewig PM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Jun; 34(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 15233393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of orthotic devices prescribed using pressure data on lower extremity kinematics and pressures beneath the shoe during running.
    Dixon SJ; McNally K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high- and low-arched individuals during walking.
    Zifchock RA; Davis I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18757124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robotic cadaveric flatfoot analysis of stance phase.
    Jackson LT; Aubin PM; Cowley MS; Sangeorzan BJ; Ledoux WR
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 May; 133(5):051005. PubMed ID: 21599096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Hinse S; Sadeghi H; Popov P; Allard P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 18768360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking.
    Levinger P; Gilleard W
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jan; 25(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16483778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking.
    Hunt AE; Smith RM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15109760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of foot orthotics and gait velocity on lower limb kinematics and temporal events of stance.
    McCulloch MU; Brunt D; Vander Linden D
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1993 Jan; 17(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 8467332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of prefabricated and proprioceptive foot orthoses on plantar pressure distribution in patients with flexible flatfoot during walking.
    Aminian G; Safaeepour Z; Farhoodi M; Pezeshk AF; Saeedi H; Majddoleslam B
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Jun; 37(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 23085538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of a commercially available orthotic device on rearfoot eversion and vertical ground reaction force when running in military footwear.
    Dixon SJ
    Mil Med; 2007 Apr; 172(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 17484322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ground reaction forces, center of pressure, and duration of stance with and without an ankle-foot orthosis.
    Balmaseda MT; Koozekanani SH; Fatehi MT; Gordon C; Dreyfuss PH; Tanbonliong EC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Dec; 69(12):1009-12. PubMed ID: 3214258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Footwear and foot orthotic effectiveness research: a new approach.
    Cornwall MW; McPoil TG
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1995 Jun; 21(6):337-44. PubMed ID: 7655477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners.
    MacLean C; Davis IM; Hamill J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 16603287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of two different types of foot orthoses on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait in a single subject.
    Michaud TC; Nawoczenski DA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jan; 29(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16396732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of gait cadence on the ground reaction forces and plantar pressures during load carriage of young adults.
    Castro MP; Figueiredo MC; Abreu S; Sousa H; Machado L; Santos R; Vilas-Boas JP
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jul; 49():41-6. PubMed ID: 25766421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ground reaction forces during gait in pregnant fallers and non-fallers.
    McCrory JL; Chambers AJ; Daftary A; Redfern MS
    Gait Posture; 2011 Oct; 34(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 21820902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running.
    Nilsson J; Thorstensson A
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1989 Jun; 136(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 2782094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of medial arch support on displacement of the myotendinous junction of the gastrocnemius during standing wall stretching.
    Jung DY; Koh EK; Kwon OY; Yi CH; Oh JS; Weon JH
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Dec; 39(12):867-74. PubMed ID: 20026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.