These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8692426)
1. Morphological analysis of the cervical spinal canal, dural tube and spinal cord in normal individuals using CT myelography. Inoue H; Ohmori K; Takatsu T; Teramoto T; Ishida Y; Suzuki K Neuroradiology; 1996 Feb; 38(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 8692426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The spinal canal, dural sac and spinal cord on cervical myelograms. Possibilities of quantification using a computer]. Mihale J; Bartko D; Turcani P Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1991 Mar; 54(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 2044176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphological analysis of the cervical pedicles, lateral masses, and laminae in developmental canal stenosis. Miyazaki M; Takita C; Yoshiiwa T; Itonaga I; Tsumura H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):E1381-5. PubMed ID: 21030896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laminar hook instrumentation in the cervical spine. An experimental study on the relation of hooks to the spinal cord. Fagerström T; Hedlund R; Bancel P; Robert R; Dupas B Eur Spine J; 2001 Aug; 10(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 11563621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myelographic findings in cervical spines without degenerative changes. Special reference to sagittal diameter of the dural sac. Nakstad P Neuroradiology; 1987; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 3614622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology. Naganawa T; Miyamoto K; Ogura H; Suzuki N; Shimizu K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20581762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of dural configuration for evaluation of posterior decompression in cervical myelopathy. Ishida Y; Ohmori K; Suzuki K; Inoue H Neurosurgery; 1999 Jan; 44(1):91-5; discussion 95-6. PubMed ID: 9894968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac]. Coulier B JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: Magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Kato F; Yukawa Y; Suda K; Yamagata M; Ueta T Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1499-507. PubMed ID: 22302162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI measurements of the cervical spine and their correlation to Pavlov's ratio. Prasad SS; O'Malley M; Caplan M; Shackleford IM; Pydisetty RK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1263-8. PubMed ID: 12811269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft cervical disc herniation. Influence of cervical spinal canal measurements on development of neurologic symptoms. Debois V; Herz R; Berghmans D; Hermans B; Herregodts P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(19):1996-2002. PubMed ID: 10528374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography? Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of morphology between patients with and without developmental spinal canal stenosis to inform the feasibility of C1 lateral mass screw insertion in the atlas. Notani N; Miyazaki M; Kanezaki S; Ishihara T; Kawano M; Tsumura H J Orthop Sci; 2017 Mar; 22(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 28017708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical roentgenoanatomy of the cervical division of the spine and spinal cord of the newborn infant]. Nazinkina IuV Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1987; (2):44-7. PubMed ID: 3591152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological analysis for subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion in developmental and non-developmental canal stenosis. Wang S; Yang G; Zhu C; Kang J; Wang Q BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):205. PubMed ID: 31077170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of CT myelography performed in the prone and supine positions in the detection of cervical spinal stenosis. Blease Graham C; Wippold FJ; Bae KT; Pilgram TK; Shaibani A; Kido DK Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 11162695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphologic analysis of the cervical spinal cord, dural tube, and spinal canal by magnetic resonance imaging in normal adults and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Okada Y; Ikata T; Katoh S; Yamada H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Oct; 19(20):2331-5. PubMed ID: 7846579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes of cervical spinal cord and cervical spinal canal with age in asymptomatic subjects. Ishikawa M; Matsumoto M; Fujimura Y; Chiba K; Toyama Y Spinal Cord; 2003 Mar; 41(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12612618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional Spinal Canal Morphometric Analysis and Relevant Spinal Cord Occupational Ratios in Congenital Cervical Spinal Stenosis: A Classification Algorithm of the Stenosis Phenotypes and Data-driven Decompression Approach. Kitab SA; AbdulKareem SB; Wakefield AE; Benzel EC World Neurosurg; 2024 Jul; 187():e982-e996. PubMed ID: 38750891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphometric determinants of the sagittal dimensions of the cervical spinal canal in achondroplasia: an analysis of the reliability of the Torg ratio. Keny SM; Suh SW; Song HR; Vaidya SV; Machavarapu MM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 17021417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]