244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8692426)
1. Morphological analysis of the cervical spinal canal, dural tube and spinal cord in normal individuals using CT myelography.
Inoue H; Ohmori K; Takatsu T; Teramoto T; Ishida Y; Suzuki K
Neuroradiology; 1996 Feb; 38(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 8692426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The spinal canal, dural sac and spinal cord on cervical myelograms. Possibilities of quantification using a computer].
Mihale J; Bartko D; Turcani P
Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1991 Mar; 54(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 2044176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphological analysis of the cervical pedicles, lateral masses, and laminae in developmental canal stenosis.
Miyazaki M; Takita C; Yoshiiwa T; Itonaga I; Tsumura H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):E1381-5. PubMed ID: 21030896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laminar hook instrumentation in the cervical spine. An experimental study on the relation of hooks to the spinal cord.
Fagerström T; Hedlund R; Bancel P; Robert R; Dupas B
Eur Spine J; 2001 Aug; 10(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 11563621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myelographic findings in cervical spines without degenerative changes. Special reference to sagittal diameter of the dural sac.
Nakstad P
Neuroradiology; 1987; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 3614622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology.
Naganawa T; Miyamoto K; Ogura H; Suzuki N; Shimizu K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20581762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of dural configuration for evaluation of posterior decompression in cervical myelopathy.
Ishida Y; Ohmori K; Suzuki K; Inoue H
Neurosurgery; 1999 Jan; 44(1):91-5; discussion 95-6. PubMed ID: 9894968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].
Coulier B
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: Magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects.
Kato F; Yukawa Y; Suda K; Yamagata M; Ueta T
Eur Spine J; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1499-507. PubMed ID: 22302162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI measurements of the cervical spine and their correlation to Pavlov's ratio.
Prasad SS; O'Malley M; Caplan M; Shackleford IM; Pydisetty RK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1263-8. PubMed ID: 12811269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft cervical disc herniation. Influence of cervical spinal canal measurements on development of neurologic symptoms.
Debois V; Herz R; Berghmans D; Hermans B; Herregodts P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(19):1996-2002. PubMed ID: 10528374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of morphology between patients with and without developmental spinal canal stenosis to inform the feasibility of C1 lateral mass screw insertion in the atlas.
Notani N; Miyazaki M; Kanezaki S; Ishihara T; Kawano M; Tsumura H
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Mar; 22(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 28017708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical roentgenoanatomy of the cervical division of the spine and spinal cord of the newborn infant].
Nazinkina IuV
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1987; (2):44-7. PubMed ID: 3591152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological analysis for subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion in developmental and non-developmental canal stenosis.
Wang S; Yang G; Zhu C; Kang J; Wang Q
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):205. PubMed ID: 31077170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of CT myelography performed in the prone and supine positions in the detection of cervical spinal stenosis.
Blease Graham C; Wippold FJ; Bae KT; Pilgram TK; Shaibani A; Kido DK
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 11162695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphologic analysis of the cervical spinal cord, dural tube, and spinal canal by magnetic resonance imaging in normal adults and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Okada Y; Ikata T; Katoh S; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Oct; 19(20):2331-5. PubMed ID: 7846579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes of cervical spinal cord and cervical spinal canal with age in asymptomatic subjects.
Ishikawa M; Matsumoto M; Fujimura Y; Chiba K; Toyama Y
Spinal Cord; 2003 Mar; 41(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12612618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphometric determinants of the sagittal dimensions of the cervical spinal canal in achondroplasia: an analysis of the reliability of the Torg ratio.
Keny SM; Suh SW; Song HR; Vaidya SV; Machavarapu MM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 17021417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative measurements of the spinal cord and canal by MR imaging and myelography.
Ros L; Mota J; Guedea A; Bidgood D
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(6):966-70. PubMed ID: 9683702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
