These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8693051)

  • 1. Action planning during the presentation of stimulus sequences: effects of compatible and incompatible stimuli.
    Müsseler J; Prinz W
    Psychol Res; 1996; 59(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 8693051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of visual-verbal load and spatial compatibility on stimulus response.
    Huang WS; Hsu CC; Liu CC; Lai CH
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):487-502. PubMed ID: 21675563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
    Müsseler J; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Jun; 23(3):861-72. PubMed ID: 9180047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.
    Shiu LP; Kornblum S
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 10598474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effector-related sequence learning in a bimanual-bisequential serial reaction time task.
    Berner MP; Hoffmann J
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):138-54. PubMed ID: 17091260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 10087857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 1996; 59(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 8923816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR; Behmer LP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1446-60. PubMed ID: 22777733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge.
    Tubau E; López-Moliner J
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 14752664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task.
    Abrahamse EL; van der Lubbe RH; Verwey WB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17896207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the response-stimulus interval on implicit and explicit learning of stimulus sequence.
    Miyawaki K
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16044316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.
    Leighton J; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.